Is the Linux operating system a future terminal for small and medium-sized enterprises?

Now all small and medium-sized enterprises are using the Linux operating system. Why are small and medium-sized enterprises using the Linux operating system? What is the end of desktop history? Looking at the popularity of cloud computing, software as a service, network applications, and free desktop, as well as the rise of netbooks and mini computers, it seems that the facts are close at hand.

However, things won't be so sudden. The desktop will not end, it will turn into a variety of forms, expand the scope of the application, we are familiar with the desktop will not disappear overnight, but will be born in a variety of desktop forms.

User Classification of Enterprise terminals and desktops

Alexander Wolfe wrote in his blog about Windows 7: "In the face of the facts, the Internet era is coming soon, in the world of netbook and iTouch Tablet, the old desktop operating system will not exist."

This comment does not know whether it is joy or anxiety. But the question is how many people want this to happen? It is easy to forget that many people still work in a world without a network, do not use netbooks, and still feel far away from themselves when hearing the Macintosh.

We can differentiate people. On the one hand, most of those who continue to use desktop desktops can be described as casual users of Microsoft Office. They use desktops because they are used to it and work well. Others are those who have to work on their desktops, such as graphic designers, engineers, Photoshop, AutoCAD, and Maya. These people will never quickly abandon their existing desktops and transfer them to network applications. What's more, network applications are still far behind in this field.

On the other side, those who can or have jumped to the "New Network desktop" or small devices. Some of them are subject to changes in work style. Others are trying to give it a try. They regard "traditional desktop" as an option rather than something that must be used.

So what is new? It's not so much about different desktops as users of different categories. There are also different ways to satisfy users. Users who need comprehensive desktops will find what they need, and users who do not need it have enough options.

Windows 7: It won't be Microsoft's last great Desktop

After Windows 7 has lowered the requirements for system resources, the discussion about whether Windows 7 can cope with low-end devices should be stopped, because Windows 7 can be freely used from a mini notebook to a large desktop.

Therefore, even those who advocate the new era of desktop, Windows 7 will adopt the same solution, even if it is only temporary. The bigger question is whether they will keep it for a long time. It may be because Windows has long-term advantages as a client operating system, or is needed by itself. There is no answer to this question and it can only be proved by time.

If Windows 7 is successful on a desktop, it will obviously be extended to other devices, whether it is a netbook, notebook or smart phone, then Windows will at least succeed to the next generation, virtualization is another challenge facing Windows 7. If you are interested in bkjia.com, you can refer to "Windows 7 will push enterprises to adopt virtual desktops?"

Linux: unqualified competitors

The future competitiveness of Linux on the desktop end cannot be ignored. The Linux operating system is a powerful operating system with a large number of high-quality software. Similar to Windows, it also makes the operation more simple, and does not suffer from the security or cost of Windows.

In fact, Linux does not compete with Mac or Windows on the desktop. The competition between Linux and Windows may be exaggerated for some reason. For example, PC manufacturers often provide preinstalled Linux as an option, while most people still choose Windows because they are more familiar with it.

The biggest reason Linux desktops do not threaten Windows is probably simple: on desktops, people are not very concerned about free and security, which is a bit surprising. Most people buy computers with Windows pre-installed, which is equivalent to free, while Vista and Windows 7 have a significant security improvement over XP, however, according to previous reports of bkjia.com, Microsoft does not seem to think that LInux is not qualified. If you are interested, users of bkjia.com can refer to Microsoft: Linux desktop system already constitutes a threat.

Mac OS X: Another destination

People who like to talk about "The desktop is dead" usually don't take apple into consideration. This is because Apple is not just a desktop problem, but the entire ecosystem, including hardware and operating systems. All the designs from roots to leaves are under Apple's control.

In terms of hardware, you must purchase a Mac to run OSX. Those who have spent a lot of money on Mac do get a perfect operating system, first-class hardware and world-class support, and there is almost no need to consider security issues.

Apple is unlikely to go to the low-end computer market to compete with netbooks. A year ago, Steve Jobs said in a teleconference that he could only make junk computers for $500.

Theoretically, the iPhone can be regarded as such a device, not a mature system, but can properly use its own computing power. In addition, the popularity of the iPhone and a large number of iPod and iPhone network developers are full of praise for Mac, which also brings a greater opportunity for Mac OS X to more desktops.

Network: Not a desktop killer

Networks and browsers have gradually eroded and replaced some basic desktop functions. It is often seen that some people say why Word is required for Google Docs, but this is basically the only way to end. Network frameworks, languages, and rich APIs can all replicate some of the actions on the desktop, but at the same time, it is a headache, and there will be many unexpected situations and problems, however, it is undeniable that online documents will become a trend. Even Microsoft provides the Office2010 free version to challenge Google Docs.

The browser itself becomes an application framework. No two browsers execute the same standards in the same way, which is determined by the design, because there is competition between them first.

Network programmers know the difficulty of handling Rich Text controls and JavaScript events between different browsers. This is because competition between browsers is getting worse, because each browser is increasing its self-protection capabilities.

The network can replace some desktop applications and create new applications that have never been used before. No one denies this. However, it is controversial that the network can replace the desktop. It is easy to implement a separate application in a browser, but it is another mission to completely copy all the functions of the desktop.

The network will not change to a desktop, but the desktop itself will change. It may become a thin client that is generated, rebuilt, or cloned as needed in some plastic boxes. This is not a theory. It has been around for a long time and is one of the key ways to commercialize desktops. For example, a mobile device is becoming a desktop device, which is usually used as an auxiliary tool to help people complete their daily work.

The end of the so-called Desktop may only be called the end of a stage, and new desktop forms are starting to sprout in many places. It is clear that the "desktop" in the future will not be as simple as the previous "desktop", it will appear in multiple forms to meet a variety of user needs.

1. Review of history: Linux Virus
2. Linux Practical Skills
3. Linux OS PK UNIX
4. VPN Server Configuration in Linux
5. Introduction to using a CD to install Linux