This week we have been exposed to the Java object-oriented content, it is really difficult to tell the truth, a variety of new terms appear, and the relationship between the different words. Object-oriented programming and process-oriented programming have a great difference, to learn to change in thinking. This week, we learned about classes and objects, as well as the construction of objects, including the encapsulation of classes, static and static constants, as well as some annotation methods. The content of the study is very much, but the study is not fine, can only tiger, from oneself proficiency master still has a very big distance. Feel Java learning more and more difficult, rely on their own self-study to read a bit of difficulty, or to take some time to see the video on the other teachers how to say, the teacher knows more will use more accurate way to teach us, master more smoothly, better than their own study. Also hope that our own teachers can teach us more in class, talk about their own ideas, Java views, and their own way of thinking. To speak out of Java rather than to book is not our rote and to accomplish the task. Hope that the teacher is our guide, give us a way to think, not blindly to the book, to all forms, as an experiment, you can speak a chapter of the content of their own ways to summarize, spend 30 minutes to speak. So through the class of learning and a bunch of teachers, you can connect the knowledge, not too fragmented, without the key points.
2016710101090 2016-2017 "Java Programming" third Week impressions