Introduction to the performance of Desktop Linux

I like the Desktop Linux version very much. In my work, I also like to summarize the experience and lessons learned about the Desktop Linux version. Let's talk about this in detail. Fedora Novell SUSE Red Flag Linux and Ubuntu Chinese Version Linux system who will be the mainstream now has a good Chinese interface and good support for Chinese Desktop Linux version, mainly divided into the following four versions: Fedora, novell SUSE (including community version open SUSE), Domestic red-flag Linux, and Ubuntu.

1. The Chinese-made red-flag Linux has a unique cultural advantage. The Chinese environment and its own application software can best meet the needs of domestic users, such as Adobe acrobat reader for viewing PDF files, audio and Video player real player, five strokes, good support for the tablet, etc. However, as a free operating system, the Desktop Linux version can only make profits on the server version. If a large amount of employees and development funds are spent on the desktop edition at the same time, it is highly cost-effective for a commercial software company and may be a lot of effort, in exchange, many users are accused and unacceptable. It is also known that the use of WINDOWS operating systems in China has become a habit and it is difficult for a computer layman to accept a different Linux. In addition, many industry software only have WINDOWS versions. If you switch to a Desktop Linux version, it is totally unrealistic to learn another software with the same functions from the beginning.

2. ubuntu: The biggest advantage of Debian is the "software library ". That is to say, you only need to check the software library, and then you can download the software from the CD or from the Internet without looking for the software download URL everywhere. Because the GNOME desktop environment is used, there are all chinese menus, Chinese help files, and good support for Chinese input. Of course, some software may still be in English, but it is much easier and easier to use than the Common English interface of KDE ). A CDROM installation disc basically includes the software required by individual users. Compared with the six or seven CD discs of fedora, of course, only one or two CD discs can be replaced with a DVD, but many personal and organizational computers only have CDROM optical drives ). Currently, the Red Flag Linux 6 and novell openSUSE Desktop Linux versions are also streamlining the release to one or two CDROM discs. For those who are still using the "retired host, and for those who do not know much about computers and Linux, it is indeed quite convenient.

3. The Redhat (Fedora in the community) and novell are not much said. The server is definitely the mainstream and popular in English language countries, but in terms of culture, compared with the red-flag Linux, A little worse. For an ordinary user, it may only need a stable and convenient computer operating environment, but does not care about how advanced it is technically crazy ). If Fedora, NOVELL, Ubuntu, Hongqi, and four versions use the same version of kernel), it will be a pleasure for those hardware driver developers and hardware vendors. Many people complain that hardware vendors did not support Linux in the past, or the support was not very good. In fact, it cannot blame hardware vendors. Different Versions of Linux kernel may require different drivers, such as the number of programmers, time, money, and versions required. As a commercial company, it is impossible to make profits.
There are still too many Linux versions. There are too many mainstream ones. When only one mainstream Desktop Linux version is left one day, we believe that the hardware vendor's support will be very timely and complete, just as the current hardware support for windows. In fact, monopoly is not a bad thing. It also means "standard" and "unified ". If a free and free Desktop Linux version is monopolized, I believe everyone is very willing to accept it.

1. A true story about Desktop Linux
2. Lu shouqun called on the industry to develop more Desktop Linux hardware drivers
3. Giant return to the arena: Red Hat returns to Desktop Linux
4. Lenovo confirmed abandoning the Desktop Linux strategy
5. Desktop Linux