Memcached Java client comparison

Some of the earlier comparisons mainly focused on the relationship between Java memcached client and spymemcached. The general conclusion is that the Java memcached client in spymemcached school has higher performance, but it is not stable as the Java memcached client. With the release of the new version of Java memcached client, some new comparative tests indicate that the performance of Java memcached client is not inferior to that of spymemcached. In addition, Java memcached client is widely used and its performance is stable, therefore, Java memcached client is the preferred memcache client.

In addition to the above two products, there is also a rising star named xmemcached compiled by the Chinese people. According to the Performance Comparison provided on the official website of this product, the performance of this product is very good. However, in terms of universality of use and future maintenance of the project, we need to carefully consider the selection.

The following is a comparison of performance tests released on the official website of relevant products. The results may not seem to be so consistent or even somewhat different. Just for your reference. After all, based on your own position and different comparison environments, inbound and Outbound traffic is normal.
Java memcached client performance comparison officially released: https://github.com/gwhalin/Memcached-Java-Client/wiki/PERFORMANCE
Xmemcached performance comparison officially released: http://xmemcached.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/benchmark/benchmark.html

Java memcached client is a secure choice.