Building a small knowledge: the definition of spam site

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

8630.html "> Sometimes talk to friends who like to talk about" website optimization ", they tend to talk about a sensitive word-" spam site "!

Although the "spam site" is often discussed between us, but for its true definition has not been, some friends think that a large number of advertising sites are spam sites;

Do not think that the flow of the site is a spam site, and there is not that users need to be the site is a spam site ...

The answers are not small. But from another point of view, they are talking about only one one-sided. The definition of "spam site" is not officially given, but

I am sure there will be a more definite answer in the future, but this is something. And from my point of view, it is the following points:

Before we cut to the chase, we might as well take a look at some of the "Web sites" that are commonly identified by netizens as "rubbish"!

From those sites, their layout is not very good, "shoddy" I would like to describe these sites the most appropriate word eye! At the same time, there are also between these sites

The window, the window generally let people feel is more disgusted, not to mention the kind of more yy window ads. This kind of advertisement is most disgusting, is also the most repugnant. The other thing, as far as the content of the website is concerned, there is nothing worth browsing. It's not pornography, it's empty. I was just opened, copy the website address after the closed. I wonder what you feel when you open it?

However, we can also draw some reference value of the "Spam Site" features:

After the first pit stop, I was disgusted by the first impression.

The second website content is empty, has no function value

The third site is too simple to beautify, even shoddy

More windows and more pornography

Five malicious code, virus

In fact, these five points should be "spam site" is the most obvious, and of course, the most common to several features. The average person on the Internet is clear, so there is nothing to be said. However, it has been mentioned that no traffic is a spam site, but this is not necessarily the case. Some of the traffic may be tens of thousands of pornographic stations, but this can be said that it is a good site it? I think not so!

I prefer the word "relative" to the definition of "junk website". The content of some websites may be suitable for some people, but may not be suitable for some people.

For the right people, they think it's a good site. On the contrary, the site is of little significance to the unsuitable crowd. When we think of something as having nothing to do with it, our first impression is that it is rubbish.

Of course, this "relative" is only for individuals. Is the term "relatively relative" not a criterion for a wide range of people?

On the basis of "relative", we can also adopt the rule of "minority obeying majority". When a website "relative" most netizens think is a good station, he can be identified as a non-spam site, on the contrary, is a spam site!

People's preferences are different, not to make certain sites are "rubbish", sometimes the wrong view may appear, but these things a little bit about it. There is no need to be serious.