Carbon Political Map Shuffle

Bong/Wen Unit GDP reduction in carbon emissions does not imply a reduction in the total amount of carbon emissions, and GDP growth figures are influenced by the policies of the Chinese government in different periods of time and dominate in China.　　After the Copenhagen climate conference, the world will enter the "post-Kyoto Protocol" era, the countries for the global "Low-carbon political system," The voice of the fierce confrontation. The main theme of the Copenhagen climate conference is carbon emissions reduction, but countries disagree. The European Union and Japan have announced their 2020 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 20% and 25% respectively in 1990, but this is far from the 40% targets required by developing countries, and the United States is only willing to cut emissions by 4% by 2020 on a 1990 basis. China has proposed a 40%-50% per cent decline in carbon emissions by 2020.　　India has said it does not make specific commitments to cut emissions and does not follow China's approach. Driven by the real economic interests of various countries, the countries of the world have formed three political camps under the framework of Kyoto Protocol. The first camp represented by the EU, the United States, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Russia and other second-tier countries, China and 77 other developing Countries (G77) formed a third camp.　　The three camps struggle against each other, and their internal and economic interests are different and contradictory. The EU has provided a theoretical basis for global low-carbon politics and has become a pioneer in this field.　　The first is to build a scientific relationship between global warming and human destruction, and then build a scientific relationship between human activity and climate change, and the middle link between human activity and the destruction of mankind is the scientific theory that carbon dioxide emissions contribute to the "greenhouse gas effect" of climate warming. Under the grand proposition of "Saving all mankind", the EU has realistic economic interests, mainly to promote the intellectual property rights of its new energy technology.　　Countries in the EU that actively promote the "Low-carbon World" include: the United Kingdom, France, Germany and northern Europe and other countries in the nuclear, solar, wind and other aspects of the global new energy technology leader, through technology, patent transfer, these post-industrial countries can gain huge economic benefits. The U.S. withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol and lost the moral commanding ground of global politics, handing the word "low-carbon politics" to Europeans.　　After Obama took office, actively promote the "Low-carbon" under the name of the new energy industry development, hoping to regain control of the "Low-carbon political" discourse right. Americans are unwilling to accept the current European-dominated carbon politics, trying to G8 the group, inviting 15 more carbon-emitting developing countries, including China, India and Brazil, to reopen discussions on carbon emissions under the U.N. framework.　　The EU is also worried about whether China, India and other countries will follow the United States to set another standard. The EU, the United States and other developed countries and China, India and other developing countries in the carbon emissions are also big differences. The Kyoto Protocol has made no clear arrangements for reducing emissions from developing countries. But in Copenhagen, developed countries tried to change, trying to force part of "advanced hairChina, India, Brazil and other countries are also taking on quantified emission reduction obligations. This will bring huge pressure on developing countries that are in the process of industrialization. If the responsibility and obligation to reduce carbon emissions prematurely, it will affect the speed of China's development in the next few years. As a result, China has proposed a target of 40% to 50% per cent reduction in GDP in 2020, which is two different from those proposed by the European Union, Japan and the US, and the reduction in carbon emissions per unit of GDP does not imply a reduction in total carbon emissions,　　GDP growth figures are influenced by the policies of the Chinese government in different periods, and the dominant power is in China's hands.　　On the eve of the Copenhagen Conference, the Group of 77 met in Beijing to call on developed countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 40% in 1990.　　The developed countries, on the other hand, have to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions significantly by quantitative means and, on the other, provide adequate financial, technical and capacity-building support to developing countries to help them cope with climate change. But developed countries do not do well in technology transfer and financial support to developing countries. At the Copenhagen Conference, developing countries demanded 400 billion dollars a year in 2020, while developed countries were willing to pay 100 billion euros (about 164.6 billion dollars). On the other hand, in the core of energy-saving technology transfer, the EU, the United States and other countries have set more restrictions to prevent technology outflow.