CPPCC members criticize statistical data beautiful figures hide worries about people's livelihood

"There is also a case in which the National Bureau of Statistics reported 70 large and medium-sized housing prices in the previous period, with the result rising by only 1.5% in 2009." "Liu Mengchong said, the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the real estate of the 2009 years, the 70 cities have risen 24%, the two digital gap is too big. Photo: CFP Liu Mengchong CPPCC members refer to some statistical data "being counted", "" growth "calls for increased" people's livelihood "in GDP 2009 GDP growth of 8.7%, oddly, 28 provinces in the country, the growth rate is higher than 8.7%; on-job workers and urban residents per capita disposable income grew by more than 10. %, can the common people feel the actual purchase ability in decline ...　　After the CPPCC member Wang Shaojie in the Great Hall of the people "shelling" GDP data "fight", yesterday, the CPPCC members from Hong Kong Liu Mengchong accepted this reporter's interview with the public credibility of GDP statistics again criticized.　　GDP data puzzle: National statistics ahead of schedule? "It is not known how many years, the sum of local GDP is higher than the national accounting data." Wang Shaojie, for example, said 2009 GDP growth of 8.7%, but the total local GDP, the growth rate is much higher than 8.7%. According to data published around the world, the economic growth rate of less than 8.7% of the 3 provinces and cities. The other 28 provinces grew at a rate of more than 8.7%, with 2 provinces exceeding 16%. What data is more reliable?　　Moreover, such local GDP and higher than the national phenomenon has been commonplace, for at least 2004 years, almost every year. "For example, on July 16, 2009, the National Bureau of Statistics announced a 7.1% per cent rise in GDP in the first half," Liu Mengchong said rudely. I am the boss of two listed companies, a listed company to spend half a year of financial results will take two or three months, our country so big, so many provinces, how can be in just half a month can be counted out? I remember that the statistics of Heilongjiang and Shanxi were not yet out, and how could the overall GDP data of the country be ' in advance ' in the ' default ' 2 provinces ' data? Wang Shaojie again questioned the official figures of the Bureau of Statistics on the average wage of urban workers. July 2009, the National Bureau of Statistics revealed that the first half of the country's urban units on the average wage of workers at 14638 Yuan, an increase of 12.9%, far more than 7.1% of the first half of the economic growth rate. "There are flaws in the statistical caliber of urban residents ' income," Wang Shaojie said. A total of 410 million urban and rural workers, but included in the national statistical range of only 110 million people. Accounting for about 70% of the total number of employees in the private sector, self-employed and migrant workers are not counted, and their average wage is far lower than the state-owned enterprises workers, this statistical method can not reflect the real income of urban residents. "Worries one:" The GDP of "people's livelihood" lower than the beautiful GDP figures, many members instead of worry,"GDP growth is to improve people's living standards," Liu Mengchong said, "Can let the common people experience the growth only count, if ' have a house no one live, someone has no room to live ', people will feel, GDP growth and I have what relationship?"　　"Investment, exports and consumption constitute the troika of GDP, and statistics show that investment accounted for an increasing share of GDP as a result of insufficient domestic demand, which accounted for as much as 67% in 2009, well above the world average." CPPCC member Song cited relevant statistics, China's final consumption rate has been much lower than the world average, of which the household consumption rate from 2000 to 46.4% down to the current 35%.　　And China's investment rate has always been at a higher level, 2003 to 2007 has been 5 consecutive years over 40%, 2009 investment as a proportion of GDP as high as 67%, far higher than the world average level. Worry two: Labor remuneration reduce income gap pull big "China's labor remuneration accounted for the proportion of GDP in 1996 53.4%, 2007 39.7%, 10 cumulative decline of 13.7%," Song that the imbalance between capital gains and labor remuneration is one of the root causes of the widening gap of income distribution in China,　　It is also an important reason to restrict the growth of residents ' consumption demand. Liu Mengchong that the decline in the share of labor remuneration as a proportion of GDP means that the income gap is getting bigger and higher, and that "labor remuneration is paid to wage earners," Liu Mengchong said. If 20% of the population had 80% of the wealth, and 80% per cent had only 20% of the wealth, GDP rose even higher, meaning little for most of the 80%. It may lead to a widening gap between the rich and the poor, resulting in more and more social problems. Liu Mengchong says GDP growth, which is linked to the benefits of the common people, is sustainable. "Your GDP has grown by 8.7%, and my income should have grown by 8.7%, what is the point if the income declines by 8.7%?" "Reason analysis" digital promotion, official rise number "How did this actually cause?"　　Many CPPCC members have pointed to the local government, because GDP growth has become a central to local assessment of leading cadres of a hard target, local governments every year to maintain a certain rate of growth to avoid being held accountable. "Now caught in a digital promotion," The circle of the number of official figures, "Liu Mengchong said," in order to boost GDP growth, local governments always focus on investment-oriented, big government projects, these huge investment is to pull up GDP, the majority of the population of working-class, farmers, migrant workers, and can not benefit from it. " "members suggested:" China has exaggerated the role of GDP to a certain extent, "the CPPCC member Liu Yunsheng that China's GDP indicators should not be too high, through weakening GDP indicators, to guide local governments, enterprises to focus on the work of the verticalChange the mode of growth and adjust the industrial structure. Liu Mengchong suggested that in order to avoid data counterfeiting, the local statistical bureau should be decoupled from local government as soon as possible into the National Bureau of Statistics vertical, "in order to compete with each other, there will always be some water figures, because the Bureau of Statistics belongs to local governments and has to obey the instructions of the magistrates." ”