Discussion on property tax rules will be difficult for academic scholars

Although the property tax policy is still in the "half cover of the Pipa", and the voice of the community has been buzzing, many scholars and experts on the specific collection rules of the formulation of a very cautious. How much should tax be levied? Is it the world's 3% or lower? According to what criteria is levied? Area or arrays? What about property appraisal?　　This is a matter of heated discussion. Professor Sheibai, director of the Center for financial and Capital markets studies at Fudan University, wrote: In Shanghai, for example, if the tax on each house is levied, each suite will be 1%, that is, 1.5 to 30,000, every year, regardless of the new or old basic 1.5 million-3 million, the annual income is only 890,000. The false use of a progressive levy may result in some social problems, such as false divorce and illegal cohabitation, through extraordinary means to evade the tax.　　The longer-term problem is that later children (only one child) will inherit and set up a house from their parents and grandparents. The Beijing Normal University Management Institute of the Real Estate Research center, Professor Dong also said that if the basis of the size of the area, quality, location of different areas of the same area of residential property tax is obviously not in line with the principle of equity, if the housing market prices to pay the property tax,　　It would be hard for people in the middle of the city's old-fashioned homes and for demolition, because they did not have a high income to bear the tax, and the price of their homes was "appreciated". "The biggest contradiction that the levy of property tax will face is the connection problem with the current tax system." "This is mainly reflected in the payment of land transfer payments," Kang, director of the Finance Science Institute of the Ministry of Finance. "Because the cost of the current housing has already covered the land transfer, if the property tax is levied again, there may be a" duplicate taxation "problem for the housing owners.　　Therefore, the formulation of property tax rules may not blindly imitate foreign practices, because from the land ownership, law and national conditions, China is more complicated than the situation abroad. In short, real estate speculation bubble wrong, reckless poke is not right, a large number of people out of work, 20 million of migrant workers back to the countryside, will panic. Xie Baisan suggested: "Should use the method of system engineering, careful to cool down, do not rise or less rise." For a bubble, slowly put gas, do not use needles to stab. Like severe patients, to use a safe, gentle way to recuperate, treatment, can not use dose. As a result, people are finished. and the mental preparation and material preparation that the economy will cool for years. ”