From the user's point of view to analyze what content is the quality of content

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Content is the soul of a site, but also determines how the user experience, can let users stay on the site of one of the key factors. We often think that as long as the original content can be updated to impress users and let users like the site. Is this really the answer? In the eyes of the user, the original content is his everything? Is that what he needs? For both questions, I do not know how to answer, but there is a point I am more certain, that is not all of the original value of the content of the user also has the same value, when your content can not solve the user's needs or users encounter problems, then your content can not meet users, Nature is not the quality of the content. Moreover the user also does not know your content is original, therefore said, stands in the user's angle to analyze, the original is not is has the value. Only can solve the user needs, even if the false original also has the same value, this is why now the network pseudo original rampant reason. So if we stand on the user's point of view to analyze, what kind of content is quality?

First, whether you can solve the user problem. We update the content, more is in accordance with their own preferences to update, like a joke type of site, the majority of the webmaster are to their own point of view to update jokes, they think funny jokes on the recommendation, thus will not care about the user's views. The author believes that the user's feedback is the best update protection, so how to collect users to their own recommended jokes are satisfied? There are three ways, 1, turnout, such as a joke content, praise difference rating of the turnout is 1:8, then it shows that the joke can not get the majority of the user's approval, may be to see a similar or the joke itself is not the point of laughter exists. 2, comments message rate, many webmaster often ignore this section, in fact, if the content of the user has value, the general user will be given corresponding comments. 3, page stay time, this we can through statistical data to analyze, usually the longer the page stay, the higher the rate of jump out of the lower, it can be explained that the content of the user is really true to produce value, or who will be bored to see some of their useless articles half-day. There is also a point, before solving the user problem, first need to understand what the user to look for the article, the user's problem is what, provide content can solve the user what kind of problem, when you understand this clearly, naturally it is very easy to update the content of the user helpful. Therefore, stand in the user's perspective to see quality content, the first need content can play a role in solving user problems.

Second, whether it can provide users with the idea of solving problems. All along, I believe that the user to give the fish as a grant to the fishing. After all, if your article is a regular solution to the problem, it's easy to get users to rely too much on your approach, and the methods that are useful to you may not be useful to others. Like forum blog promotion, some webmaster can be used to promote success, and some stationmaster is always failed. The same way different people use the effect is also a difference. Therefore, personally, if the content is simple and direct to the user to solve the problem, it will certainly not be long-term benefits, because this will make users too dependent on your content to provide the method, over time, let the user gradually formed a not to think of the strange elephant, At the same time may also because the user uses you to provide the method but does not have the corresponding effect to the site content has produced the not to trust psychology. Therefore, the content is best to provide solutions to the idea rather than the direct method, after all, the same method because the operation of the different methods of the results are also different, there are good and bad, obviously not very good to gather the user to form a good atmosphere of communication. At the same time also because you provide a useful way for users, but the following are some useless methods, so that users gradually lost access to the site interest, not very good to maintain the freshness of content. Therefore, the award of fish is not as good as a fishing, so you may get less early, but can accumulate users, but also will not let users lose their independent thinking.

Finally can let the user carry on two times to propagate. The most direct and simple to determine what content is valuable to users of course is to share the number of reprinted, after all, who will be all right to reprint some of their useless content? Like a joke, if you don't feel funny, or you don't like this joke, how can you share it with others? Therefore, when we analyze what content is good content, we can pass the content of the dissemination rate. A value for the user content of its reprint rate is certainly not low, or that sentence, users will not share their dislike for no reason content. When users feel that this content is useful or useful to their friends and colleagues, or that they think that there is a need for sharing, then this content can naturally be called high quality. So, whether the content is high quality, first of all to see whether it was two times spread, we A5 in the soft text to promote their site, if the article is recommended to the home page or audit through, from the surface can be considered this article by the editors recognized, The reason for the audit is that the editors think this article is valuable to other users, naturally we can also use this method to analyze what content is useful to users, what kind of content is a quality content.

Update quality content is not a day to write some of the network does not appear on the content to update on the line, can be said to be high-quality content must meet the above three points in the line. After all, users can not tell whether your content is original, and regardless of whether your content is original, as long as meet their needs, then your content can be called high-quality, this is our user perspective to determine the value of the content of one way, so we say, when we update the content, The first thing to think about is whether the content will bring value to the user, rather than considering the original article first. This article is about here, by Gouai literature net http://www.9552.org exclusive feeds, A5 start, reprint please specify, thank you!