Novice talking about several reasons for the return of A5 soft paper submission

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

There are 10 Lais on the A5, in the above there is excitement and sadness, excited is to see three black characters have been audited, sad to see the blue is returned, and also thought of giving up the submission, but in a friend's advice and encouragement, after all, still not be abandoned, Because in A5 contribution not only can promote their own site, but also can quickly improve their writing level, as well as the popularity of their own, one at a time to the benefits of three, now think about once really a little child gas. After all, even a little setback can beat you, just a few times is returned to let you eliminate the idea of continuing to contribute, it does prove that you will never be the top of the group of people. Here also thanks to the editors of A5, it is because they take the trouble to return the manuscript in order to make my writing more and more diligent. Here are some reasons why your soft paper submission has been returned.

1, the topic no new cliché

Every day A5 accepted the free contribution in 200 to 300 articles, in so many manuscripts, how to let their manuscripts not be returned? The first topic is the key, if even the topic is to write some cliché content, how can impress the editor? After all, editors have to review a lot of manuscripts every day, even the title is no new ideas are commonplace, Nature is returned three words forever belong to you. The author in the experience of submission, just write some cliché, such as friendship Link exchange, snapshot update, keyword ranking instability reasons and so on are returned, because the article has been audited than your content is also readable, and too cliché content will let the site content repeat high, After all, seo this aspect of things are just four things, content, outside the chain, update, adhere to. Different articles is only a new, no point of new ideas, how could it be approved? So, in the reasons for the failure of the submission, the cliché topic is one of the reasons for the audit not to pass.

2. Lack of examples of content emptiness

Content is the soul of a site, the same as in the A5 submissions when the editors require content to provide other users with valuable information, however, a lot of manuscripts are not passed, is not a good sentence is not smooth, but the content is too theoretical, after all, who will not speak, the editor to the substantive content, There are specific cases of operation, like the author has contributed to an article on the combination of Youku potatoes, that is also a kind of behavior, in writing, most of the speculation and so on, and there is no reference to the data or examples to prove their point of view, naturally in a few editorial review when the submission is returned. The author summed up, in the A5 of the reasons for the submission of soft text, the proportion of content occupies 70%, if your title slightly old-fashioned, as long as the content of a specific case or actual data for reference, or their own operational experience to illustrate, as well as paragraph sentences between the fluent, generally can be passed. Therefore, in the submission does not pass, we should again read their own content, to see whether the content is too theoretical, if they are users, whether the content can really extract valuable information.

3, typographical confusion paragraph is not clear

When editing an audit manuscript, the favorite is to be able to publish the word without change, so that the editors who want to audit a large number of manuscripts every day can improve the speed of audit. This also reflects the importance of typesetting to the approval rate. A composition of the correct format, the section of the local section, the merger of the merged, you can make the article as a whole more tidy, such a manuscript even if the content is not how, but it is because the first impression of the editor is very good and increased the audit pass rate of chips. So the two small details of typesetting and segmentation if not handled well, a long hundreds of words of the article directly after the display, so that the section is not standardized at the same time and unfavorable to users to read the article how to improve the approval rate? Sometimes it is because the irregular layout makes the quality of the article drop a grade, It also causes the article to be returned because of this small detail.

4. Obvious signs of advertising promotion

In A5 submissions, the most likely to be returned is the composition of the advertising component is obvious. Imagine if you are a user, you also like to see advertising information? Webmaster in the submission, the first to learn to put their own promotional information hidden in the content of the article, the soft article is actually to promote the information into an article, so that the article on the surface does not look like advertising, at the same time the article must have the authenticity of the content. This is one of the key points. And if your submission soft text is frequently returned, then it is necessary to analyze the quality of their articles, the first point is to see whether the article is suspected of advertising, and then see whether the quality of the content of the user is helpful, the final advertising hidden depth is reasonable, at least on the surface can not see advertising it. If you want to insert ads, we can use examples as a lead, so that ads appear reasonable, so that it becomes an indispensable part of the success rate of contributions to contribute greatly increase the chip. So, although A5 contribution can promote the site, but also need to grasp the traces of advertising, too obvious advertising traces will eventually let soft text get Blue is returned.

5, do not understand the submission rules, do not read the guide to submit

In the manuscript audit does not pass the reason, not only above four points. There are many reasons that will affect the manuscript will not be approved. The author summarizes several common reasons here. One false original, I believe that we all know, A5 but is original, pseudo original and copy can not pass. Second, do not look at the submission guide, the author suggested that each contributor should seriously look at the two submissions guide, understand the submission rules. The three articles appear sensitive words, such as some of the words that are searched and blocked. Its four promotional links everywhere, the general promotion link is the most ideal position is the bottom of the article, so will not affect the user to read, but also will not affect the approval rate. All in all, a careful understanding of the rules of A5 submission will not allow your manuscript to often get the three words returned.

In A5 to contribute so long, which had bitter and sweet, at the same time in the submission of this period, but also let the author's writing level mentioned a new step, although for some soft master or insignificant, but I think, the world does not have a free lunch, want to succeed must do their own fencing, with the true ability to speak, believe me, Believe you, let us and A5 through thick and thin, continue to accompany together to go down. This article by the http://himusic.5d6d.com Breast Enhancement Product List 10 strong exclusive feeds, reprint please specify, thanks!