The use of huge land transfer should be made public

For the real estate industry, this year is undoubtedly the most frequent regulation policy of the year. However, the land market is still active in general. It is reported that 2010 years ago three quarters, 30 urban land transfer gold accumulated close to 900 billion yuan, an increase of 70%.　　and large benchmarking room still not bad money, take the enthusiasm does not reduce. What is even more surprising is that many cities still have difficulty in completing their year-round plans. Central Plains Real estate data show that as of early September, Beijing completed only 2500 hectares of land plan for the year 26%. Shanghai completed its annual plan of 74%, Guangzhou and Shenzhen respectively completed the annual plan of 18% and 33%. This means that the land transfer will create a new annual record if the whole country is completed in full throughout the year.　　Data show that 2004 national land transfer of 589.4 billion yuan, in 2005, even if the state tightened "root" situation, the total amount of land transfer is still 550.5 billion yuan; in 2009, only the land transfer price is as high as 1.6 trillion, a year to a new level. Because the land transfer gold repeatedly refreshes the record, therefore becomes the media public opinion as well as the public general attention focus.　　For ordinary people, in recent years, hanging in the land transfer gold on the many "mystery", has always bothered everyone, pressing the government functional departments to solve the "mystery." On the one hand, the astronomical order of magnitude of land transfer gold in the end where? According to the different sources of land transfer, there are two different stipulations in the law. In accordance with the provisions of the 55th of the Land Administration Act of the People's Republic of China, the land paid use fee of the new construction sites "30% turned over to the central government, 70% to the local people's governments, and they were specially used for cultivated land development". For the construction of the stock of land, "the People's Republic of China Urban Real Estate Management Act" 18th stipulates: "The right to use the right to transfer the right to all financial, included in the budget for urban infrastructure construction and land development."　　However, the reality is that, because there is no clear and authoritative information, land use for many years as a "mystery", we simply can not determine where the land transfer money in the end. At the same time, how much has the land price been raised? According to statistics, in the composition of real estate enterprise development Total cost (direct cost and operating cost), the expenditure to government is about 44%, and the proportion of total expenditure (total cost and total tax paid) to government is up to 49.42%. Last February, a report submitted by the National Federation of China's "two sessions", said that in the total cost of housing development, land costs accounted for the highest proportion, reached 41.2%. This is only the dominant revenue from government land sales.　　Although local governments are the biggest beneficiaries of house prices, land transfer is an important driver of house prices, but no one has acknowledged it, especially in the land sector and local governments. Moreover, how many land transfer funds have been illegally diverted? In May this year, the National Audit Office issued 11 provinces of all levels of government from 2007 to 2008,The results of the audit investigation on the management and use of special land funds.　　The audit results showed that the income management of 67.481 billion-yuan land transfer in 11 cities was not standardized and was not included in the Fund budget management, accounting for 20.1% of the total levy. Now the problem is, we only know that the land transfer money "from agriculture, and used in the city", the city has become ever-changing, the countryside is still dilapidated; only know the urban residents of the land transfer money, is used for the affluent class, the general residents can only hope that the house sigh; Because there is no clear and authoritative information, it can be foreseen that in the fragile government financial management system, the revenue of the Ming account can not be open, transparent, let alone the Ming account of the land transfer money?