Who's going to protect me? Original pseudo problem branding is the positive solution

Intermediary transaction SEO diagnosis Taobao guest Cloud host technology Hall

In the face of the increasingly spread of the network "copy collection False original", adhere to the original grassroots webmaster had to face the brutal reality is that they boil more information to write out the original content is easily others "copy collection False original", the network "Who to protect my original" question has been heard.

My original first content Baidu does not accept, and "Qiatouquwei" copy Baidu weight is very high

In the beginning, I also like many friends, the hope of protecting their own copyrights in the "Web content recommender" search engine, through the content of copyright information published the first time after their own blog, and then with the copyright information submitted to the A5 and other high-weight industry sites-but even so, Replaced copyright information Copy Collection pseudo original things are still not uncommon, even in Baidu so by others copy collection False original article weight is more than I original--not to mention I am now blog Baidu down right, one months to an original content Baidu do not accept, and so "Qiatouquwei" false original but received a lot.

This dilemma shows that at any time, the responsibility to protect their own rights and interests are completely pushed to others-including search engines and even look forward to legal protection is not reliable things, the state's existing laws expressly prohibited, social morality is unanimously condemned, the question is that you have a lot of time and energy rights? Not to mention moral condemnation. Therefore, in this case, it is clear that we do the purpose of the station, change the operation of the Web site is imperative.

First, we must understand that the fundamental tenet of the Internet is "sharing information, delivering value"-not just the search engine, but even the author of every reader who cares about valuable original content rather than original content, and we are no exception, in the "talking about the value of Internet pages", Baidu Search and Development department emphasizes a " Valuable original content "only through" site gain "(more sites, in particular, the high weight of the site reproduced, more users through various forms of continuous recommendation) and" content gain "(more readers to make insightful comments) in order to fully reflect the value of original content-this is exactly the basis of the original popular copy collection artifacts.

From this point of view, all kinds of copy collection pseudo original operators as though people can not agree, but it makes your original content has been more widely disseminated, which is also the value of your original content of a certain, but more of the reprint of the original imposter for their own, steal the original author from the original content should be derived from the proceeds ( Website weight and author reputation), let a person grin.

This is indeed a moral question, can be in such a "copy collection false original" popular era, so "being imposter" also just explains that we do not have brand awareness, we can call for legal protection of network copyright, but we certainly can not wait for legal rights to further reduce costs after we adhere to the original content, this is certainly not realistic.

So, we also follow the crowd, take the "copy collection Pseudo original"? What do we do? The key issue is that we no longer tangled in the "network how popular cottage, who to protect my original content" This problem, it is too negative, but through perseverance of high-quality content, unique content to create our brand awareness, this is the best way to crack the "cottage phenomenon".

As I said before, in general, every reader or even search engine care about the value of original content is better than the original content of the author, but nothing is absolute, when you have a unique original content to achieve the ultimate, the creation of their own style, the situation will be an incredible reversal- The reader cares more about the original author than the content itself, because only the original author can bring the unique user experience that "this song should only be in heaven, and the world can get a few back". The best explanation is the singer, the same "wolf", the number of chin, perhaps more people only recognized the bar? The same "Olive Tree", the number of people who turn over, may be more only to recognize chyi it?

The same is true on the Internet, why very few people false original style of creation of the blog Bowen, reprint should be marked by the author? Even the "Ming Dynasty" of the Pirates of the countless, but they all want to take "the Moon" name. And the same goods may not be well-known store prices lower, but more people will only recognize the "Han" and "Wheat Bag" bar. This shows that when you really become a well-known website in a certain industry, copy collection pseudo original your content simply can not hurt the original author, but will only make the content of the original author more popular, and others will only despise copy collection False creator's moral low-although now dumbing, but most people still care about their moral reputation.

Therefore, for the current cottage network in China, to build their own website of the industry brand awareness is the original content out of the "copy collection Pseudo original" The only way to crack.

Brand sites do not rely more on search engines or other large web sites to bring traffic, but rely on the core users of the Word-of-mouth recommendation (and other recommended forms) to bring more new users to visit-for well-known brand sites, search engine is only a useful supplement to their own site to bring more long-term users of the beneficial supplement just, This is precisely after being blocked by Taobao, Baidu eagerly launched and constantly improve the "do not search that use" function reason.

It is strange that, although brand sites rely on search engines or other large sites to bring traffic, but their search engine weights are often higher than those who rely entirely on Baidu's web site to bring more traffic, more can get Baidu favor trust-although Baidu also know, Those who rely entirely on Baidu webmaster and Seoer are Baidu's most loyal core users (seed users). But Baidu is more aware that if it relies solely on copying and collecting artifacts from the original low quality core user (the seed user), he will die miserably.

Such an example is worthy of our deep thinking, Confucius said: "Do not suffer from the ignorance of people, suffering from unknown people also", "do not suffer from people's ignorance, suffering its not also", our website to really make a name, do not dwell on "who to protect my original" and so on "pseudo problem", do not waste their precious time and limited energy on these issues, As long as we can really "know people"--go into the industry, truly understand what potential users really need, so as to find their own unique perspective, to our own unique way of interpreting these problems, the perfect solution to their own "can not also" problem, to the potential users with a more satisfactory answer, then we distance breakthrough " The bottleneck of people's ignorance is not far off.

A friend asked me, you so hard to write a blog every day, not afraid of others copy collection False original? I said, almost every article I have been copied to collect false original, I am also very sorry, but I am not angry, because I know, sometimes I write blog post to 5 o'clock in the morning, such an attitude can never be copied by others to collect false original, Because if you can do this, also do not need to copy collection pseudo original my article. I believe that the station as its people, believe that "road horse horsepower, day long see the heart" in the network this virtual world also applies.

Many friends will be my article with the starting site upload Baidu Library, thank them

And, in the past year's blog writing process, although copy collection pseudo original trend still, but I have felt very few grassroots webmaster's kindness, they did not like others copy collect false original my article, they in I have never been on the Baidu Library and some of the forum reproduced my article, have taken my link, It really touched me.

Some netizens on the forum are very despise to copy collection, thank you

There is even one time, I will own blog "diametrically opposed to the chain is not issued to the" posted in a well-known webmaster forum, annotated original, immediately there is a netizen thread questioning: "Have you really written?" Such a serious questioning attitude let me understand that the vast majority of people to copy collection False original or disagree, It is hard to insist on your own efforts, but the general direction is right, the key is to stick to it.

So the question of "who protects my originality" is simply a wrong question, which inevitably leads to the wrong answer, and it only shows that we are not clear about our own self-confidence and our goal, in a society that is not as hopeless as we think. The only way to defeat the original copy collection is to create a continuous flow of high-quality articles with their own style, and eventually form their own style, even Baidu and other well-known sites have to respect your three points.

"It's better to be on your own by heaven!" This is the best solution to all problems, as long as we really have such an attitude, seriously reflect on their own, learning to learn rather than simply copy collection pseudo original others, we will certainly be able to overcome all kinds of difficulties, really create a only belong to our own brand road ( This article from the original SEO Yunnan first, copyright, Wenzing, reproduced in the form of links to indicate the starting source http://www.gouyn12.com/wzyy/320.html.

In the face of the increasingly spread of the network "copy collection False original", adhere to the original grassroots webmaster had to face the brutal reality is that they boil more information to write out the original content is easily others "copy collection False original", the network "Who to protect my original" question has been heard.

My original first content Baidu does not accept, and "Qiatouquwei" copy Baidu weight is very high

In the beginning, I also like many friends, the hope of protecting their own copyrights in the "Web content recommender" search engine, through the content of copyright information published the first time after their own blog, and then with the copyright information submitted to the A5 and other high-weight industry sites-but even so, Replaced copyright information Copy Collection pseudo original things are still not uncommon, even in Baidu so by others copy collection False original article weight is more than I original--not to mention I am now blog Baidu down right, one months to an original content Baidu do not accept, and so "Qiatouquwei" false original but received a lot.

This dilemma shows that at any time, the responsibility to protect their own rights and interests are completely pushed to others-including search engines and even look forward to legal protection is not reliable things, the state's existing laws expressly prohibited, social morality is unanimously condemned, the question is that you have a lot of time and energy rights? Not to mention moral condemnation. Therefore, in this case, it is clear that we do the purpose of the station, change the operation of the Web site is imperative.

First, we must understand that the fundamental tenet of the Internet is "sharing information, delivering value"-not just the search engine, but even the author of every reader who cares about valuable original content rather than original content, and we are no exception, in the "talking about the value of Internet pages", Baidu Search and Development department emphasizes a " Valuable original content "only through" site gain "(more sites, in particular, the high weight of the site reproduced, more users through various forms of continuous recommendation) and" content gain "(more readers to make insightful comments) in order to fully reflect the value of original content-this is exactly the basis of the original popular copy collection artifacts.

From this point of view, all kinds of copy collection pseudo original operators as though people can not agree, but it makes your original content has been more widely disseminated, which is also the value of your original content of a certain, but more of the reprint of the original imposter for their own, steal the original author from the original content should be derived from the proceeds ( Website weight and author reputation), let a person grin.

This is indeed a moral question, can be in such a "copy collection false original" popular era, so "being imposter" also just explains that we do not have brand awareness, we can call for legal protection of network copyright, but we certainly can not wait for legal rights to further reduce costs after we adhere to the original content, this is certainly not realistic.

So, we also follow the crowd, take the "copy collection Pseudo original"? What do we do? The key issue is that we no longer tangled in the "network how popular cottage, who to protect my original content" This problem, it is too negative, but through perseverance of high-quality content, unique content to create our brand awareness, this is the best way to crack the "cottage phenomenon".

As I said before, in general, every reader or even search engine care about the value of original content is better than the original content of the author, but nothing is absolute, when you have a unique original content to achieve the ultimate, the creation of their own style, the situation will be an incredible reversal- The reader cares more about the original author than the content itself, because only the original author can bring the unique user experience that "this song should only be in heaven, and the world can get a few back". The best explanation is the singer, the same "wolf", the number of chin, perhaps more people only recognized the bar? The same "Olive Tree", the number of people who turn over, may be more only to recognize chyi it?

The same is true on the Internet, why very few people false original style of creation of the blog Bowen, reprint should be marked by the author? Even the "Ming Dynasty" of the Pirates of the countless, but they all want to take "the Moon" name. And the same goods may not be well-known store prices lower, but more people will only recognize the "Han" and "Wheat Bag" bar. This shows that when you really become a well-known website in a certain industry, copy collection pseudo original your content simply can not hurt the original author, but will only make the content of the original author more popular, and others will only despise copy collection False creator's moral low-although now dumbing, but most people still care about their moral reputation.

Therefore, for the current cottage network in China, to build their own website of the industry brand awareness is the original content out of the "copy collection Pseudo original" The only way to crack.

Brand sites do not rely more on search engines or other large web sites to bring traffic, but rely on the core users of the Word-of-mouth recommendation (and other recommended forms) to bring more new users to visit-for well-known brand sites, search engine is only a useful supplement to their own site to bring more long-term users of the beneficial supplement just, This is precisely after being blocked by Taobao, Baidu eagerly launched and constantly improve the "do not search that use" function reason.

It is strange that, although brand sites rely on search engines or other large sites to bring traffic, but their search engine weights are often higher than those who rely entirely on Baidu's web site to bring more traffic, more can get Baidu favor trust-although Baidu also know, Those who rely entirely on Baidu webmaster and Seoer are Baidu's most loyal core users (seed users). But Baidu is more aware that if it relies solely on copying and collecting artifacts from the original low quality core user (the seed user), he will die miserably.

Such an example is worthy of our deep thinking, Confucius said: "Do not suffer from the ignorance of people, suffering from unknown people also", "do not suffer from people's ignorance, suffering its not also", our website to really make a name, do not dwell on "who to protect my original" and so on "pseudo problem", do not waste their precious time and limited energy on these issues, As long as we can really "know people"--go into the industry, truly understand what potential users really need, so as to find their own unique perspective, to our own unique way of interpreting these problems, the perfect solution to their own "can not also" problem, to the potential users with a more satisfactory answer, then we distance breakthrough " The bottleneck of people's ignorance is not far off.

A friend asked me, you so hard to write a blog every day, not afraid of others copy collection False original? I said, almost every article I have been copied to collect false original, I am also very sorry, but I am not angry, because I know, sometimes I write blog post to 5 o'clock in the morning, such an attitude can never be copied by others to collect false original, Because if you can do this, also do not need to copy collection pseudo original my article. I believe that the station as its people, believe that "road horse horsepower, day long see the heart" in the network this virtual world also applies.

Many friends will be my article with the starting site upload Baidu Library, thank them

And, in the past year's blog writing process, although copy collection pseudo original trend still, but I have felt very few grassroots webmaster's kindness, they did not like others copy collect false original my article, they in I have never been on the Baidu Library and some of the forum reproduced my article, have taken my link, It really touched me.

Some netizens on the forum are very despise to copy collection, thank you

There is even one time, I will own blog "diametrically opposed to the chain is not issued to the" posted in a well-known webmaster forum, annotated original, immediately there is a netizen thread questioning: "Have you really written?" Such a serious questioning attitude let me understand that the vast majority of people to copy collection False original or disagree, It is hard to insist on your own efforts, but the general direction is right, the key is to stick to it.

So the question of "who protects my originality" is simply a wrong question, which inevitably leads to the wrong answer, and it only shows that we are not clear about our own self-confidence and our goal, in a society that is not as hopeless as we think. The only way to defeat the original copy collection is to create a continuous flow of high-quality articles with their own style, and eventually form their own style, even Baidu and other well-known sites have to respect your three points.

"It's better to be on your own by heaven!" This is the best solution to all problems, as long as we really have such an attitude, seriously reflect on their own, learning to learn rather than simply copy collection pseudo original others, we will certainly be able to overcome all kinds of difficulties, really create a only belong to our own brand road ( This article from the original SEO Yunnan first, copyright, Wenzing, reproduced in the form of links to indicate the starting source http://www.gouyn12.com/wzyy/320.html.