Differences between ubuntu and Fedora

The difference between ubuntu and Fedora -- Linux general technology-Linux technology and application information. For more information, see the following. Original: yafengabc

Is ubuntu installation too stupid? I remember that it was too difficult to install debian. In fact, I installed ubuntu in full compliance with debian's routine. full customized installation means that ubuntu is as difficult to install as debian for my installation method, but it is extremely free. I think this is the biggest advantage of the deb series. For new users, the ubuntu-desktop installed by default is big and complete, and it is enough. For comrades who have "Jie Li" in this way, I can completely customize the system. If you say that ubuntu has forced you to install something, but fedora doesn't. Well, I can compare it to someone who has a smaller system. After I installed gnome desktop, I only had about mb. If I installed KDE, it would be about MB smaller (Ubuntu7.10 ), if your Fedora is younger than mine (of course, it is not counted that you manually uninstall the software cropping system after installation, because I have not uninstalled the software package at all, just installed what I need), then I will admit defeat, if the opposite is true, it proves that more things are forcibly installed on fedora.

As for the compilation success rate, I have never used fedora. It is hard to say, but the highest success rate should be gentoo. Because the software in ubuntu is full, I try to avoid compilation and installation, in ubuntu, I have compiled the kernel, the latest compiz-fusion, EVA, and so on, and even lfs I have compiled on ubuntu. I don't know what I can't compile.

I do not agree that fedora8 is more stable than ubuntu7.10. The current linux release version is homogeneous and uses similar versions, but at least the fedora8 software is updated and the RC version is more stable, I have nothing to say if the systems with relatively unstable software are more stable.