Do not misinterpret "Ubuntu does not use DOS alternatives"

On June 18, MarkShuttleworth met with the chairman of the China OSS Promotion alliance and said: "Ubuntu is not a DOS alternative ". What does this sentence mean? Let's ask, what is Mark's purpose in China this time? The fact is that Mark's visit to China was not designed to visit the OSS alliance, but to negotiate with the Ubuntu OEM (I will not talk about it here. Only in this context can we correctly understand the exact meaning of "Ubuntu does not use DOS alternatives. Mark does not mean

On April 9, January 18, Mark Shuttleworth met with the chairman of the China OSS Promotion alliance and said: "Ubuntu is not a DOS alternative ". What does this sentence mean?

Let's ask, what is Mark's purpose in China this time? The fact is that Mark's visit to China was not designed to visit the OSS alliance, but to negotiate with the Ubuntu OEM (I will not talk about it here. Only in this context can we correctly understand the exact meaning of "Ubuntu does not use DOS alternatives. Mark is very clear about the specific situation in China (Linux is often uninstalled). Here, we do not have to "point out" ourselves in China.

The OSS secretariat published the article "Ubuntu is not a substitute for DOS" and did not dare to explain the background of Mark's visit to China (the real purpose). The article left his head off and gave up his personal image.

The OSS secretariat asked me, why didn't Mark look for you, Yuan, during his visit to China? To deliberately promote the OSS alliance and strive to belittle others. Here, I solemnly declare that I and Mark do not have any "private exchanges". I praise him or criticize him. It is my personal freedom. Mark does not have to come to see me, this may be better. Forget the ugly state of the OSS Alliance secretariat!