Domestic PHP Original Forum Ofstar CTB wdb discuz fastboard Comparison-----Personal Summary
As the fastboard of travel is encrypted, it's not a comparison--of course it's a good program.
The following comparison single from the technical point of view, do not consider personal good, after all, personal good, individual!
The following main comparisons are: speed, stability, safety, load capacity, backstage, foreground function
Comparison of Ofstar and CTB
1, Ofstar far faster than CTB in speed.
2, in the stability of CTB or the use of traditional stability concept, in a sense is not stable!
3, in the security of CTB does not filter malicious code, such as the security problems caused by!
4, in the load capacity, when a large number of data exist, CTB exists management, search, thread, post browsing caused by the load relatively large!ofstar adopted a unique reading and writing algorithm, the first time to break through the text database load problem!
5, the background of CTB and Ofstar strengths, but in the backup, CTB backup more trouble
6, front function CTB is inferior to ofstar!
7,CTB start early, CTB plug more, ready-made style is also more!
Comparison of Ofstar and wdb
All existing wdb (original, or hack version) of the existence of a very serious security vulnerability, you can easily get the administrator password! So do not do a detailed comparison, simple: stability, security, load capacity, backstage, template sets are less than Ofstar, and later other people's modified version of the speed far less than Ofstar
Comparison of Ofstar and Discuz
Ofstar uses a flat file database, discuz using MySQL database
1, speed Ofstar far faster than Discuz
2, in the stability, due to the use of different databases, such as a larger coverage, but Ofstar unique text stability algorithm, this is relatively excellent, but also in large-scale forum experimental success!
3, in the security, due to the use of different databases, comparative reduction, on the code Ofstar more than Discuz free version of strong
4, due to the different physical structure of the database, in the load capacity and background management, because the Ofstar adopted a unique algorithm, the two are comparable!
5, the front desk function, Ofstar in the picture and accessories of anti-theft do better, backstage function Discuz user group function than Ofstar perfect, the other is comparable!
6,discuz development early, more plugins
(Source: Pocky)
http://www.bkjia.com/PHPjc/314758.html www.bkjia.com true http://www.bkjia.com/PHPjc/314758.html techarticle Domestic PHP Original forum Ofstar CTB wdb discuz fastboard Comparison-----Personal summary due to the fastboard of travel is not to do the comparison--of course, a good program below the comparison list from ...
