Check whether the Linux operating system is properly mounted to the hard disk

Article Title: Check whether the Linux operating system is properly mounted to the hard disk. Linux is a technology channel of the IT lab in China. Includes basic categories such as desktop applications, Linux system management, kernel research, embedded systems, and open source.

Whether or not the Linux operating system needs to be flushed into a disk has been controversial for a long time. Here we will analyze the related issues. The so-called "disk" means falling onto the hard disk. That is to say, should the Linux operating system be installed on a computer's hard disk? How can this idea be created? Is my mind crazy?

At this moment, I use the Linux Desktop installed on the hard disk (Ubuntu 10.04 Beta 1) for writing, and I feel a strange way in my mind, because in the past one or two years, I always write on a USB flash drive Linux Desktop. So should Linux be installed on hard disks? Whether to install Linux on a hard disk is good or has many disadvantages? This is not a purely speculative question. Let's talk about the facts.

Facts (time) have proved that installing the Linux operating system on the hard disk is almost the same as installing it on a USB flash disk in other operations, except for the faster startup speed. Of course, in terms of data security, stability, and reliability, there is a certain gap between the USB flash disk and the hard disk. There are many unfavorable factors in the USB flash disk. However, from another point of view, USB flash drives also have irreplaceable advantages.

First, from the perspective of intellectual property protection, Linux installation on a USB flash disk is completely legal;

Secondly, there are many types of Linux, and the installation of USB flash drives is more conducive to the free spread and increasing prosperity of the Linux family;

Third, the Live system generated by the Linux operating system installed on the USB flash drive is easy to carry and travel;

Fourth, for example, I have installed a Linux version on my hard disk.

Naturally, it is unlikely that another Linux version will be installed on the same hard disk, which greatly reduces the equal development opportunities for different Linux versions. However, this will not happen if you install Linux on a USB flash drive.

Imagine a user having a USB flash drive with a Linux version with different characteristics. This is the benefit of Linux not storing disks.

So shouldn't Linux be "flushed into a disk? Some people think that "disk" takes root. I don't know. In fact, it takes only 10 minutes to install Linux on the hard disk from a USB flash drive. It is not difficult to "disk. However, after Linux is "flushed into the disk", it will be lively and charming. I'm afraid XP will be left cold. This is unfair. Hard Disk is XP's home (or base), Linux is now a third party (later intruders), such a reputation is not good. In this way, it is hard to get XP "out of the disk" (out of the game) for a short view (suicide. Linux shouldn't be the XP killer (or a substitute). They should be good friends. Let them "Stay in bed" and hug each other!

Today, the Linux operating system desktop style is really not ordinary, very charming, for example, Ubuntu 10.04 desktop. The appearance of the new Ubuntu 10.04 version is shocking, So that you cannot resist her temptation and will eventually be attracted by it. In fact, I am using her Beta version (already on the hard disk), because I can't wait.

The actual situation is that all types of Linux operating system versions have the same quality (the quality is generally improved a lot), each of which has its own characteristics and is difficult to distinguish. With the help of USB flash drives, Linux self-production systems are embedded into various "small ornaments", such as wallet, small handbags and key chains. This is a good business experience.