What is the real reason why Linux is hard to popularize?

What is the real reason why Linux is hard to popularize? -- Linux general technology-Linux technology and application information. For details, refer to the following section. I am a layman. I will post the results from the layman's perspective.

It's late, and it's not for the common. Just like the Norwegian who created this operating system and the spirit of those who advocated it, freedom is his greatest character, and freedom does not mean free. In fact, linux is also commercialized, apache server is a good example. The meaning of freedom is that you can change it freely, because its source code is open, which is useful for open-source communities and useful for masters, it is useful for people who are familiar with unix. But for ordinary people, what can they do besides the finished products developed by open-source communities? You know, compiling the Linux kernel is a very profound learning. In China, even a top computer college student is hard to do. For ordinary people, we can imagine that the support power behind linux is awesome. Of course, many people will scold me, but in my opinion, they do, they can only develop a series of things for free (possibly) to use on the Internet, and the late birth of linux also caused his inherent shortcomings. The hardware provider rarely takes care of him. For example, he cannot compare the performance of Multiple Coal bodies with that of Microsoft windows, and may not be able to drive the sound card. Of course, some people can use linux to create a hacker Empire (not quite clear, but there is a movie made on linux). But what does it mean? When you do interior decoration for others, do you want to design cartoons for others, and find a few high-paying experts to do this kind of work for others? What's more, can you find them? It seems that he is not free, but he is really expensive. However, he is not a fan of Games. The ridiculous thing is that linux enthusiasts don't want to do this, but they always encourage people not to play games?

For windows, it is really expensive to pay for a single operating system, but he won't have so many incompatible hardware and won't have so many questions (at least compared to linux ), in addition, it is mostly software in various aspects. Most importantly, it is constantly improved and new versions are always available. It is also a blessing for commercialization. In addition to monopoly, which can make people hate him, it is really good. For windows, linux can only be said to be a reason for "symbiosis. In fact, if the source code is also available for windows, linux will no longer exist.