Linux is lacking in dummies

Linux is a lack of dummies-general Linux technology-Linux technology and application information. The following is a detailed description. Today, when talking to friends about Linux, she said that the Linux founder LT said "Gnome treats users as fools" and urges people to use KDE. I think this is the sorrow of Linux. Most computers are also potential users of Linux who are not familiar with computers. Why should they be familiar with computers, what should they be familiar with Linux, and why should they put their bodies down to learn Linux with an empty mind?

What makes Linux worth doing for it.

After reading the above text, you may think that I have a good idea about Linux. I have no preference for Linux and like it, but I have to say that many people familiar with Linux are playing basketball.

What is "playing basketball "?

Actually, this is a word I created myself. Because I often see people playing basketball, they have a good sense of street basketball, and there is a disgusting way to put their hands on it, but they are deeply immersed in it, and they are extremely narcissistic. However, the most failed thing is that such modification does not cover the fact that he cannot make the ball.

Linux is used. For example, when beginners ask a question on the Forum, they are very enthusiastic. They just give someone a command and don't talk much about it, every time a newbie encounters the same problem, he just copies the command.

There are many operations on Linux that can be completed on the interface. Almost all daily transactions can be completed with a mouse click. I am not talking about laziness, but it is enough for most people. I just want to use Linux to work, listen to music online, where he needs commands, where he needs to know what open source software is, what is a license agreement, and where he needs a terminal.

I have some disappointment from Ubuntu6.06 to 8.04. More and more memory is required. However, it seems that the operation is not easy. We are still doing common things, and we are not using it to set up servers, not as a supercomputer, but as a normal transaction. In addition to some small changes in the interface, I really don't know what the upgrade has improved.

"Playing basketball" again, we improved the program, code, and execution efficiency of the program. In fact, for most users, a single operation is completed within 1.5s before the upgrade, and 1.2s after the upgrade. We don't care. What we need is a concise and clear interface. This is enough for an operation to be completed quickly.

I think the distribution of Linux releases should be completely distributed. For example, the Ubuntu Desktop version is easy to use, so you don't have to worry about code optimization. Let's see the difference of S. And the server version, then try to optimize the code. That's all.
Now, let's go back to what the Linux Founder said. As we can say, there are so few Linux users. On the one hand, Microsoft has taken the lead and, more importantly, Linux has always given users a "hard" feeling, it's just a chance to play basketball. In fact, it is not difficult, it is not difficult. However, it is difficult to give people. It can be discouraged by many people.

I dare not say what kind of operating system is good. However, for systems that are commonly used, in addition to security and stability, the most important thing is ease of use. We criticize WINDOWS so much that it is stupid and the code efficiency is low. However, the reality is that most of us are still using WINDOWS. It is more difficult to use Wine to simulate a large game in WINDOWS than to log on to the sky.

If you say you have installed the system by yourself according to the Linus T sentence, you will be asked to help you automatically bring up the system and introduce him to the general structure and possible problems of the system, you need to consider the options and how to perform simple maintenance in the future. In this way, it is better to install the KDE release version (of course, there are indeed many excellent release versions that use KDE, such as SuSE ). After the installation is complete, nothing will be done. If the user understands West Point, nothing will come out. Listen to an MP3 file and watch a half-day technical article. Try again. You need to change a lot of files on the previous network and then enter another command. Download a software and compile it.

It is much easier to change an interface to be easy to use than to optimize a bunch of code. Why don't we do this much? Why should we always be a "cool? Why not add a vivid help document on the desktop by default? Why cannot I have a simple Wizard program.

We are so infatuated with the programming technology, rather than the interface design skills, is it similar to focusing on professional proficiency many years ago rather than comprehensive quality.