Linux requires self-reflection

Linux requires self-reflection-general Linux technology-Linux technology and application information. The following is a detailed description. Last time I saw an article about Linux's dissatisfaction with Ubuntu, saying that Ubuntu does not represent all of Linux, but does not represent the Linux culture. Maybe, I'm actually worried about the development of Linux. Too many releases of Linux have left users who want to try it blank. It's hard to say that Ubuntu has been around for a while, and the battle for Linux lineage has begun to emerge, which makes people wonder: can Linux continue to grow? Can it really shake the Windows market? (If you don't expect a screen that is "popular all over the world", it's enough to bring the Mac market influence on the desktop system to the end of Windows's support)

Linux market positioning: embarrassing and chaotic

I think the most failed part of Linux is its own market position. Too many released versions make Linux very messy, so that users who want to try Linux cannot start, even those who are already using Linux "experts, it is not clear which level of the product you are using. Linux always wants to break down the server market and get the best experience from desktop users, so the user experience is poor, the Server market share has not increased significantly (but Windows Server is becoming increasingly popular among small and medium enterprises, which is rather ironic ).

Linux supporters may disagree with me, saying that Linux is also divided into two versions: Desktop and Server. For example, Ubuntu has two different versions: Desktop and Server, and Suse. These two versions have different packages. For example, some Server versions do not install graphical operation interfaces by default, and some Server versions do not install required protocol packages, in terms of kernel and openness, there is no difference between the two. Some people have to refute it again, as does Windows and Mac. Yes, but do not forget that Linux components are basically free of charge. It is complicated to install the Server Package on the Desktop. Because Windows and Mac are commercial release software, it is neither allowed nor possible to "Upgrade" to the Server version by installing components.

The free and free Linux is originally an advantage, but it is discussed here, which has become the culprit of the current chaos. I suggest that you continue to refute me. Search for the tutorial on Linux server configuration first. What did you see? The Desktop distribution is used everywhere for Server configuration. Supporters may also think that this is a good thing and is the advantage of Linux. Back to my previous question: Which of the following is the release version?

People who support Linux will continue to support it. Just like those who like Windows, they will try their best to prove its advantages. However, the difference is that Linux, as a starting point (Unix evolved), is always unacceptable because it is a product favored by most professionals.

Linux is not as high as Unix, so the core servers of large enterprises use Unix. As for small and medium-sized enterprises, Windows Server is easy to use and economic (comprehensive discussion) is becoming increasingly popular. What about Linux? The cost of technical support and the salary of related technical personnel are high. Linux server maintenance is not cheap! The advantages of Linux are only stable.

Linux has too many cool and proud users

There is no shortage of Excellent Software in Linux. But perhaps because most software is independently developed and then released for free, the entire release and production process is not perfect. Although Linux has its own self-decompressed installation format, many software still need to execute make on its own. It is said that some of them only think that this can better reflect the uniqueness of their software.

As for the other part, I often think of myself as a "master" of 3D desktop games, so as to "be able to modify a spectacular and beautiful desktop environment" without answering or ignoring the confusion of beginners. To be honest, this so-called "master" is at most an experienced player. Those enthusiastic about desktop beautification are usually players in the early stages of the computer. You must know that the real masters are basically doing "practical" and a practical desktop environment can satisfy them. Therefore, you will often hear that many Windows experts are using Windows classic desktops. Linux Experts use RedHat, a Linux release that highlights performance and functionality.

Conclusion

Ubuntu has its own clear positioning. It focuses on the general desktop user market by focusing on optimized simple operations and beautifying the desktop environment. It is a pity that we have heard a lot of discord while seeing Ubuntu succeed. The "masters" in Linux started to avoid over-simplified Ubuntu models. However, Because Ubuntu inherits the openness of Linux, this high degree of "freedom" has created a large number of players that are known as "Masters", and then they have to fight new players preparing to get involved in Ubuntu ...... So, a vicious circle begins ......

Reference CB-this is so inharmonious that the future of Linux is worrying!