MySQL tools and backup

Saw the netizen Wang open source "A Chinese it thinking -- Evaluation of the United States took the lead to cast ooxml yes vote" (http://blog.csdn.net/arthur5933/archive/2008/03/19/2197087.aspx) article, coupled with a little recent sentiment, to make up this article.

. Net has been in contact for almost six years. I have read many technical books, turned to msdn many times, browsed many webcases, followed several versions of Vs, tried several demos, but never used them in practice. I am so ashamed.
Why? Is it true that liberalism is blaming?
Indeed, vs integration is so complete and convenient. Why bother us? Every time he persuaded himself to approach. net, he left.
When using SQL Server, you miss MySQL; when using ASP. net, it reminds me of PHP and ror. When IIS is unstable, it is "cheap" to toss Apache. When considering enterprise applications, I think that if MS is bound to death, it will be a headache for viruses, security, and stability. At this time, Java will inevitably win. net RCP, recently suddenly found that SWT and eclipse RCP are better choices.

After all, Ms's historical mission (that is, making people accustomed to using PC software for office and entertainment) is coming to an end. The future is an open-source world. Why is Ms unable to meet (monopolize) the information needs of the world (which is exactly what Ms has been committed ), the world requires many excellent teams or individuals to create standards in the competition, rather than a company.
Those who are superstitious Ms open their eyes to have a look: Server Linux-Windows Server, APACHE-IIS, PHP-ASP (including ASP. net), Java -. net, MySQL-SQL Server, eclipse-Vs, flex-WPF In the IDE field, and ror -. net ...... for desktop windows on which Ms depends, you can compare Vista with Ubuntu to see if the latter is more advanced and safer.

Indeed, what we need most now is standards. However, what we need is no longer a company, a team, a large collection of standards, but uneven standards, but the fact standards formed by the world's continuous innovation, excellence in competition.
In fact, the super strength of M $ should be the King, rather than the whole world. Imagine that if MS can try to integrate standards to help users and developers, rather than constantly forcing standards to break personal interests, the IT world is bound to be harmonious and efficient (for example, if MS was sincere enough to work with sun in Java, now it will be a perfect and unified VJ ++ era ). But it may be a deep-rooted defect of capital self-interest. Such a thing may only exist in our imagination.

So, goodbye, M $.