On the performance of string connection in Javascript

Source: Internet
Author: User

1. How to connect strings?

First, let's review the two common methods of string connection:
1.1 Use the String concatenation operator

Common languages (such as Java, C #, and PHP) all have string Concatenation Operators, and Javascript is no exception. Sample Code:
Copy codeThe Code is as follows:
Var str = "";
Str = str + "";

1.2 use Arrays

In common languages, the performance of string connection operations is generally not high. Therefore, in C #, StringBuilder (StringBuffer provided in Java) is used to connect strings. In Javascript, the method of simulating StringBuilder through Array is introduced.
Copy codeThe Code is as follows:
Var str = [];
For (var I = 0; I <100; I ++ ){
Str [I] = "12345 ";
}
Str = str. join ("");

2 Test

The following describes the performance of the two methods by copying strings:
2.1 copy using the String concatenation operator:
Copy codeThe Code is as follows:
Function copyByOperator (str, times ){
Var newStr = "";
For (var I = 0; I <times; I ++ ){
NewStr + = str;
}
Return newStr;
}

2.2 copy through Arrays:
Copy codeThe Code is as follows:
Function copyByArray (str, times ){
Var newStr = [];
For (var I = 0; I <times; I ++ ){
NewStr [I] = str;
}
Return newStr. join ("");
}

Str uses a fixed HTML string with a length of 61.
2.3 IE Test

Considering the poor performance of IE, first use a small number of times (6000) to test in IE 6, IE 7, and IE 8. Take the average value after running 10 times. The result is as follows:

Test results in IE browser
Browser CopyByOperator CopyByArray
IE 6 1780.4 ms 9.5 ms
IE 7 1754.6 ms 7.7 ms
IE 8 1.6 ms 9.4 ms

IE6, 7 and IE8 test results are far from each other, obviously,IE 8 optimized the string connection operation, which is more efficient than the array COPY method..

2.4 testing in various browsers

Next we will use a relatively large value of times (50000) to test various browsers of the latest version.

Test results of various browsers
Browser CopyByOperator CopyByArray
IE 8 21.8 ms 54.7 ms
Firefox 3.6 40.9 ms 27.9 ms
Chrome 4 4.4 ms 10.9 ms
Safari 4.0.5 41.6 ms 34.6 ms
Opera 10.50 33.1 ms 23 ms

This result is really unexpected. In IE 8, the string connection operation beat all browsers other than Chrome. You should pay attention to the low performance of IE. In Chrome, the string connection operation is more efficient than the array replication method.

3. Conclusion

The browser's performance is constantly improving. As a front-end engineer, you must adjust the optimization policies of Javascript programs in a timely manner to achieve the best performance.

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.