Replies on the Javascript framework are worth watching

I saw an article on zemanta's blog. The reply from Eran Medan was surprising. I watched it together:

I agree, I can't keep up, I just finished learning backbone. JS and now I'm found out on that it's old news, and I shoshould use Ember. JS, cross that, it has opinions, I shoshould use meteor, no, angularjs, no, Tower. JS (on node. JS), and for HTML templates I need handlebars, no mustache, wait, Dot. JS is better, hang on, why do I need an HTML Parser inside the browser? Isn' t that what the browser? So no HTML templates? OK, Dom snippets, fine, Web Components you say? W3C are in the game too? You mean write regular JavaScript like the Google guys? Yuck, oh, I just shocould write it with cofeescript and it will look OK, not coffee? Coco? Livescript? Dart? GWT? OK, let me just go back to Ruby on Rails, oh it doesn' t scale? Grails? Groovy? Roo? Too "Springy? "OK, what about node. js? Doesn't scale either ?? But I can write client side, server side and MongoDB side code in the same language? (But does it have to be JavaScript ?) OK, what about PhP, you say it's not really thread safe? They lie ?? OK, let me go back to server coding, it's still Java right? No? Lisp? Oh it's called clojure? Well, it has a bridge/protocol buffers/thrift implementation so we can be language agnostic, so we can support our Haskell developers. or just go with Scala/lift/play it's the best framework (foresquare use it, so it has to be good ). of course we won't do soap and will use only JSON restful services cause it's only for banks and Walmart, and God forbid to use a SQL database it will never scale
I 've had it, I'm going to outsource this project... they will probably use a WordPress template and copy paste jquery to get me the same exact result without the headache and in <del> half </del> <ins> quarter </INS> price

Chinese Translation:

I admit, I cannot keep up. I just learned backbone. JS, but now it is out of date, I should use Ember. JS, some people say that I should use meteor, no, angularjs, no, Tower. JS (based on node. JS), and for HTML templates, I should use handlebars instead of mustache. Wait a moment, Dot. JS looks better and slower. Why should I use an HTML Parser in a browser? Isn't the browser doing this? So shouldn't HTML templates be used? Yes. Use Dom snippets. OK. Do you mean Web components? Isn't W3C dedicated to this? Do you mean developing a common JavaScript language like Google? I only need to use coffeescript. It does a good job and does not need coffeescript? With Coco? Livescript? Dart? GWT? So, I should try Ruby on Rails again. Oh, it's not scalable? Grails? Groovy? Roo? Too simple? Well, how about node. js? Poor scalability ?? But with it, I can write the client Code Server-side code. You can also write MongoDB code in the same language. (Do I Have To use JavaScript ?) So, how about PhP? Are you saying it is not really thread-safe? Are they lying ?? Well, let's go back to the server-side programming. How about using Java? Not good? Lisp? Oh, should it be clojure? Yes, it has a bridge/protocol buffers/thrift implementation, so that the language is connected, so that our Haskell Program Developers can also develop. Or use Scala/lift/play. They are all the best frameworks (foresquare use them, and they must be good ). Of course, we should not use soap. We should use JSON restful services. Only banks and Walmart should use soap. Moreover, SQL databases cannot be used, and they cannot be extended.

I understand. I plan to outsource this project... They may use a WordPress template and copy and paste some jquery code to achieve the same effect without any headaches mentioned above.