Second Job app analysis

The first part of the research, evaluation

1. Download the software and use it.

Today I want to analyze the software app is the UC browser this software, UC Browser user group is still quite a lot of, as one of the mainstream browser app, the overall user experience is very good. The simple interface also has the middle of the common application of the label, the user can do their own frequently browse the use of the page to put there. Daily headlines can give users a better understanding of the important news of the day. And the news was classified. The setting options below are also simple and easy to understand.

：

2. A bug exists.

In the process of using this software, the overall experience is good, but when you click on the download logo on the page, although in the cache list of the screen cache, but in fact, the video screen is not cached, will always be in the prompt to cache. I found on the Baidu results are, customer service said some of the screen because of copyright problems can not be downloaded, but users in the use of the user did not prompt users which screen because of copyright issues and can not download, which makes the user experience very poor.

Description of the 3.bug.

This flaw I think probably because UC in the cache this feature, the cached link address is not verified, resulting in an unauthorized link address, the video will continue to be stuck in the state of execution

4. Choose a Friend (user) to interview and record it.

4.1. Introduce the background and needs of the interviewee.

Xiao Huang is a regular web site to browse the network, but also like to see some funny small screen, but because it is still a student, the school will be in the evening after 11 o'clock, mobile phone traffic is not much. So often the video you want to see is cached.

4.2. Let the interviewee use the function of the product.

Xiao Huang downloaded the app and spent 15 minutes experiencing the various features. In the aspect of browsing the site, small yellow is very satisfied, but in the video cache, little yellow found that there are a lot of video can not be cached (almost all the video), which makes me wonder whether this feature is not available at all.

4.3. Describe the user's use of the product process, the user's problem solved it? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the software in data volume/interface/function/accuracy? Is there a problem with the user experience?

The user's need for video caching is still unresolved, although the software has no problem with the interface and other functions, but it is a major flaw in the video caching function.

4.4. What are the user's suggestions for improving the product?

For the video cache this feature, if not cached, should give the user a hint.

4.5. Conclusion:

Now the browser is generally the same, I am the old UC powder, especially like his novel bookshelf function, but because the video cache this flaw let his score down a lot, so, the overall feeling is good. Personal reviews are good, but I don't recommend it for people who like to cache videos.

Part II Analysis

1. Function:

The main function is the Web browsing, in the input of the URL to support voice input and scanning, on the page also support the use of common URLs to set up tags, novel functions can also be cached in the novel, to join the bookshelf. Adding a page is also easy, click the box below the toolbar to select the page.

2. Analyze the current merits of the software (compared to similar software) and infer the important aspects that the software team can improve in terms of software engineering (specific recommendations). The results of the comparison are asked to List a table comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each software.

UC compared to other browsers, there is no advantage in all aspects, and there is a considerable disadvantage, the entire page is not innovative, more traditional, not give people a bright feeling, and the overall interface and other browser differences is not very large.

Browser name	Interface	Function	User Experience	General comments
UC Browser	7	6	6	7
QQ Browser	8	8	8	8

3.[additional questions] for different dimension ratings, the user experience, UI aesthetics, core functions, respectively scored (can give a more detailed score more excellent).

The scoring standard assumes a 10-point system.

User checkup: 6 points

Beautiful UI interface: 7 points

Core functions: 6 points

Part III recommendations and planning

1. If you are a project manager, how can you improve and win in the competition?

As a project manager, to improve their competitiveness of the first requirement is to make the entire app all the functionality of the bug, and then some of their own features on some of the characteristics and simplification, not too complicated.

2. What kind of products are available on the market?

QQ Browser, Baidu Browser, Google browser

3. What kind of features do you want to design?

Web Recording feature.

4. Why do you want to do this function, not other features?

With the hot live, and sometimes to see the fun of live footage, we always want to record him down, so I think this feature is still relatively timely.

5. Why does the user use your product/feature?

N: You can record the fun moments while watching the live broadcast from anywhere.

A: Many people like to watch live but not all live streaming apps.

B: Users don't have to download special apps.

C: I believe adding this feature will give you a better advantage, eliminating the hassle of downloading a whole bunch of live apps.

D: User authentication, account log in.

6. If your team has 5 people, 4 months, you as a project manager, how should you configure roles (development, testing, artwork, etc.)?

Art 1 people, test 1 people, develop 3 people.

1 weeks of demand analysis (including market research).

Development for 13 weeks.

Test for 3 weeks.

Second Job app analysis