The difference between URI and URL learning

There has been a lot of technical controversy, the most wonderful of which is probably the question of what the Web address should be called. This is usually the case: someone calls the contents of the Address bar "URL", and some people get a bit of a perk: "No!" In fact, that's the URI ... ”

"URIs can be divided into url,urn or one thing with locators and names characteristics at the same time. A URN acts like a person's name, and the URL is like a person's address. In other words: The urn determines the identity of the object, and the URL provides a way to find it. ”

• Ftp://ftp.is.co.za/rfc/rfc1808.txt (also a URL because of the protocol)
• Http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt (also a URL because of the protocol)
• Ldap://[2001:db8::7]/c=gb?objectclass?one (also a URL because of the protocol)
• Mailto:[email protected] (also a URL because of the protocol)
• News:comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix (also a URL because of the protocol)
• tel:+1-816-555-1212
• Telnet://192.0.2.16:80/(also a URL because of the protocol)
• urn:oasis:names:specification:docbook:dtd:xml:4.1.2

These are all URIs, some of which are URLs. What? Are those that provide access mechanisms.

The difference between URI and URL learning