Thoughts on Linux

Some Thoughts on Linux-general Linux technology-Linux technology and application information. The following is a detailed description. Thinking about Linux is like thinking about what? A pretty girl or a freak?

I can't blame you for thinking so. Obviously, some programs are not suitable for the desktop at all, but we must declare that they have the best and most powerful functions. I admit that some linux applications are indeed the most functional, but far from the best. Taking a browser I recently used as an example, K-melon uses the Firefox kernel. firefox ------ is a software closely related to Linux. K-melon was originally a good software, and the result was developed by the group of programmers. The speed was fast. This was my first feeling, but it was not useful or I could not find the desired function. Advise programmers to look at the definition of the word "design. Alas!

There is a discussion on the Internet:

1. Linux stands for grassroots and freedom.

1. Free Software represented by Linux is the pioneer of grassroots culture, and Linux and the Internet drive the rise of grassroots culture;

2. The growth of Linux proves the victory of the grassroots class in challenging the monopoly class of the privileged class and promoting the establishment of civil society;

3. the Linux model promotes win-win cooperation and is an advanced model for sustained and healthy economic development.

Two prospects:

1. The spirit of freedom, harmonious atmosphere, and evolutionary consciousness are inevitable choices for the continued development of Linux and other free software;

2. The grass-roots Linux community will certainly play a more active role in China's Linux industry chain;

2. Others strongly believe that linux should be open, not free.

3. Some people think that it is irrelevant and that it is almost the same. No, at least I think so.

A friend commented:

"Linux is open-source. The purpose of the software industry is to make money. However, if the developed software can be used by others for free and can be modified by others, how can we make money? In addition, other companies can also change and re-release their products. Is there any commercial secrets? Besides, if there is no money, which company is willing to develop software? If there is no money, what should Linux programmers rely on for dinner? What can we do with Linux without important software? If these problems really exist, I think there is no future for Linux. In the operating system alone. If Linux is really good. Open source is very competitive. On the contrary, it is open-source and requires its application software to be open-source. I think it restricts its development. Because it cannot bring profits to most companies. For me, I still like LINUX very much. However, if you cannot make any money on Linux, it can only be used as a hobby ."

The monks think that the write speed is low, but the write speed is excellent. Another question I have been thinking about for a long time: compatibility.

Compatibility is the beginning of the user experience. Many software vendors (mainly Linux software developers) think so, but let's see what compatibility is! I personally disagree very much, mainly referring to "asymmetric compatibility" (self-developed words ).