I personally think that the strategic purpose of Ubuntu is very clear among many Linux releases, and the founder of Ubuntu has a clear mind, because I have read his reports and he has been reminding Linux to apply it, more humane, this sentence is more advanced than those of other technologies, and it is more advanced to support this one, because the application is the most active way, at least I think so. Ubuntu's strategy is obvious, so it's a matter of course, because it has been moving towards a more easy-to-use direction, so I think it is the most promising alternative to Wi
I personally think that the strategic purpose of Ubuntu is very clear among many Linux releases, and the founder of Ubuntu has a clear mind, because I have read his reports and he has been reminding Linux to apply it, more humane, this sentence is more advanced than those of other technologies, and it is more advanced to support this one, because the application is the most active way, at least I think so.
Ubuntu's strategy is obvious, so it's a matter of course, because it has been moving towards a more easy-to-use direction, so I think it is the most promising replacement for Windows Linux.
In the Linux field, do you understand Ubuntu like this? I don't want to refute it when someone says Ubuntu has broken the Linux rules. I just want to say, please refer to the results of Ubuntu.