Ubuntu Kirin promotes evidence of excessive competition

On February 23, March 23, REUTERS published an article titled & rdquo; Chinadevelopsnationalopen-sourceoperatingsystem & ldquo;. The article is in the warning sentence & rdquo; Chinaisworkingahome-Example-yeargovernmentplantog

REUTERS published an article entitled "China develops national open-source operating system" on March 23. in this article, add a pair of warning comments under "China is working a home-grown operating system as part of a five-year government plan to get more Chinese people using open-source software "five-star red flag.

"The move is an attempt to stop China being reliant on Western software. "it means that this attempt attempts to end China's dependence on Western software. Is that true? None.

Are our five-star red flags placed like this? How do I put five red stars on the right? Is the mind edited by Reuters crazy? Ubuntu Kirin is just a customized Linux release. How can I "Stop China being reliant on Western software ?" In fact.

In reality, the modernization of our country is inseparable from the support of Western software products and from the support of advanced technologies of Western countries. We should build our own Linux release version and build our own development community. However, we cannot rely on a set of "Airborne" Linux releases to degrade and suppress the role of other Linux vendors in China, unity is power.

Ubuntu Kirin does not have any potential user base, so over-promotion will be counterproductive. If it is not done well, it will cause trouble.

For more information about Ubuntu, see Ubuntu special page http://www.linuxidc.com/topicnews.aspx? Tid = 2