With the full application of various applications, there is a growing number of cooperation disputes due to apps, many of which are in the final case. WeX5 (HTML5 development tool) summarizes three typical real cases for you to experience the conflict situation of party A.
Do you have enough vigilance while watching others quarrel? Have you ever thought of a way to circumvent these controversies?
One of the onlookers: What is the mobile app capable of? Is 20,000 a "throw out"?
According to Guangzhou Gao, in early 2014 with an information technology company signed a contract, commissioned them to develop mobile phone app, and paid 27,000 yuan on the spot. Later suspected of fraud, want to recover the advance, but rejected.
January 20, 2014, Miss Gao participated in a "micro-marketing" course organized by "Guangzhou Select Hui Information Technology Co., Ltd." (hereinafter referred to as the "optional Hui Company"). Miss Gao applied for the "handheld Xinyang" this app. "Operating period of 3 years, the annual payment of information service fee of 9000 yuan." "said Miss Gao.
According to the choice of Hui Company, "The mode of operation is to help customers to attract and charge 10% commission." But until March, the company has not given Miss Gao any information. Through the constant negotiation of Miss Gao, the choice of Hui company finally provided the "handheld Xinyang" APP, but did not provide the relevant invoices. Although the "Handheld Xinyang" client wish to go online, but Miss Gao the quality of its operation is not satisfied. "There are few content updates, and there are only a few points in each column. ”
"Cast 20,000 of the plurality into, so far has not produced a little return." "Since June, Miss Gao has been asked to refund the company, even to the police station, but the other side still do not agree to refund."
WeX5 (HTML5 development tools) Reviews: First of all, to strongly appeal to app developers, app provider Integrity Management ! at the same time, also hope that the app needs to understand: app is app, operation effect is operational effect, the two sessions, should be differentiated to look! Or that sentence, before talking about money, the app needs to be clear "what kind of app do you want?" "This is more important than money!" never add too many unrealistic fantasies to apps ! Often fantasy too much is the precursor of being cheated.
the two onlookers: after 4 months of software development delivery The other company said it didn't meet the requirements .
25-year-old Huzhou Xiao Liu is a personal identity engaged in software development programmer, last January, through a friend introduced a contract with a network company in Hangzhou, to help its development of an app, the contract price is 30,000 yuan.
This seems to be a good income of extra money, did not expect to play a lawsuit later.
At that time, Xiao Liu and the network company signed the contract, the company first pay small Liu 12000 yuan in advance, the duration of the small Liu Kaifa app for 15 working days, when Xiao Liu on time delivery software three working days, the network company to the software acceptance, qualified after the payment of small Liu 12000 yuan, After the network company's customers through 3rd, the last 6000 yuan of the final payment to Xiao Liu.
Xiao Liu in the agreed deadline to deliver the app, the company did not raise objections, and did not pay Liu's remaining 18000 yuan Price, in April last year to the small Liu proposed to add new features to the requirements of the app, and Xiao Liu orally agreed with the new function price of 12000 yuan, so that the development of software funds totaling 42,000 yuan.
After the delivery of the new app, Liu, the remaining 30,000-dollar company under the contract, was delayed.
Xiao Liu annoyed in sent a lawyer letter in the past, the company sent back said, Xiao Liu's software does not meet the contract agreed delivery time, standards and the existence of quality problems, the remaining money is not paid.
In this way, Xiao Liu sued to the court.
In the trial, the Internet company did not attend the reply. Xiao Liu said that the contract clearly agreed software delivery three working days of acceptance, and the company until May in 2014 to raise objections, has seriously exceeded the contract agreement, should be regarded as acceptance of qualified. At the same time, the company also did not put forward specific technical indicators in the contract, just require a function.
The court held that the contract is the true meaning of both sides, and does not violate the mandatory provisions of the law, the establishment of law into force. The defendant did not pay the remaining money to Xiao Liu, constituting the liability for delay in the payment of the breach, but because of Xiao Liu with the network company on the new function of the agreement is oral agreement, Xiao Liu can not provide evidence, the court for this part of the 12000 yuan not support, and finally, the court ruled that the network company paid Xiao Liu 18000 yuan.
WeX5 (HTML5 development tool) Reviews: In this case, the developer in the first delivery of the app development results to party A, since party a did not raise objections, it should be required to sign the party. pay attention to the written communication records, pay attention to both sides signature confirmation! This is how many years of software projects with blood and tears in exchange for Tiekun Ah!
three onlookers: In app development, a quote can I include two versions of Android and Apple?
Mr. Jiang, Ningbo, last March to find a technology company in Hangzhou, commissioned its development of an application software, and signed a mobile platform development and service opening contract. The contract agreed that the technology company should be within 30 working days of the Framework column production, 2 months on-line beta, 3 months in the application market shelves.
On the day when the two sides signed the contract, Mr. Jiang paid the company $108,000 development fee by credit card transfer. Since then, the company began to make the software according to the contract agreement. In the meantime, Mr. Jiang used the company's software to make modifications to other companies. Originally in order to make the software more optimized, but did not expect to cause the dispute between the two sides.
Mr. Jiang believed that the technology company did not follow the contract agreed time to develop software and on-shelf maintenance, serious infringement of their legitimate interests, and the company believes it is Mr. Jiang repeatedly requested changes, the development of time should be postponed, he has fulfilled the obligations under the contract.
At the same time, the two sides on the development of software version is also controversial, Mr. Jiang said: "Of course, the Android Apple two version ah?" The company said: "You pay a fee, I can only give you a version!" ”
The two sides disputed, then found that the contract also did not stipulate the conditions for the dissolution of the contract. Mr. Jiang sued to cancel the contract and return the $108,000 he had paid. Finally mediation case, the company returned Mr. Ginger 32400 yuan.
WeX5 (HTML5 development tool) reminds: Before the conclusion of the contract should make the necessary development requirements, requirements analysis and other work, and the development progress, content, standards and other detailed provisions, so that in the conclusion of the contract will be clear specific technical information and approved by both parties acceptance of the contract as an annex to the contract to give its effectiveness, In this way, we can lay a solid foundation for the development work and the smooth performance of the contract, and avoid the disputes and disputes arising from the unclear contract.
More say, in fact, if party B with the HTML5 development tools (such as WeX5), can support both Android, Apple and other terminals, this matter will not lead to disputes. APP development process using HTML5+CSS3+JS technology to achieve bootstrap responsive layout, no need for Android, Apple alone to develop different versions, one version can support each terminal, similar to this dispute can be completely resolved. This is the root cause of the H5 app's overnight popularity. The advantages of H5 app are certainly far more than that, with the introduction of HTML5 specifications, H5 app is already a trend.
Continue to read more related articles: http://wex5.com/cn/2016/01/
What are the consequences of a party B conflict in app development? Can H5 APP development change the status quo?