What is better for a Linux system than Vista?

& Nbsp; reading tips: fans often praise Linux as the best operating system. This voice is even higher since vista went public, despite Microsoft's repeated optimistic predictions and comments, however, Vista far did not achieve the expected results. There are many reasons: Price, lack of driver support, and earlier applications cannot run on Vista. Linux  

Reading Tips: fans often praise Linux as the best operating system. this voice has increased since vista went public, because despite Microsoft's repeated optimistic predictions and comments, however, Vista far did not achieve the expected results.

There are many reasons: Price, lack of driver support, and earlier applications cannot run on Vista. Is Linux really better than Vista? Of course, Linux is free, while Vista has a minimum of 99.95 US dollars and a maximum of 399.95 US dollars. does Linux have a cute mascot-little penguin or Vista? Even if it does, is it cute? To put it bluntly, Linux has at least five advantages over Vista:

Hardware requirements

Linux does not require too much storage space and strong hardware kernels, but Vista is demanding: it needs a "modern" processor (Pentium 4 at the worst) and mb ram (memory here), and even 1 gb ram is recommended. How can I install the Vista host with a 60 GB hard disk and 64 M graphics card.

In comparison, some versions of Linux can even run on 64 m memory and 486 processor machines, and such Linux also has a graphical user interface. Generally, the Linux version only occupies 1g of the system disk.

The user interface of Vista is beautiful, but not simple. User response is slow because system resources are occupied. Vista uses a GPU instead of a CPU to present graphics, while GPUs occupy a lot of storage. it only needs MB for screen rendering Vista, not to mention the entire graphic interface.

Security

Windows has almost no antivirus software or applications, but Vista is indispensable. Generally, Linux is safer because most virus makers target Windows attacks.

No restrictions

Linux does not strictly define how to use content in the system, but Vista imposes many constraints.

Vista's Digital Rights Management reduces the speed of computers and requires technical support. there is a possibility of incompatibility or conflict with hardware and software. These are as simple as upgrading, as complicated as replacing hard drives, such as Vista's HD-DVD and Bluetooth copy protection technology.

In Linux, music and movies can be played smoothly and the software can run. Linux does not interfere with the user's right to use the software and applications, and Vista's self-protection consumes CPU.

Linux does not have Linux Genuine Advantage

No matter which version of Linux is installed, Linux runs and has no function unavailability concerns. Vista relies on the Windows Genuine Advantage server to verify the serial number. When the server goes down, Vista users all over the world are inexplicably deprived of the right to use Vista legally. This never happens in Linux.

More and more Linux applications

The addition of Linux applications has enabled us to stay away from the tedious Windows operating system.

Do not like Microsoft Office limitations? Using Open Office; Vista using Paster with uneven light as the image editor, while most Linux uses GIMP 2.2-a powerful application with Photoshop performance; how much security and performance problems does ie bring us? Use Mozilla in Linux.