What kind of attitude do you have between Linux and windows?

What kind of attitude do you have between Linux and windows? -- Linux general technology-Linux technology and application information. For details, refer to the following section. I. windows has many excellent things that need to be absorbed by linux. For example, his desktop window system and his file management system. His settings center, his menu system. When a good thing becomes a habit and a standard, why should we change it. Is it because he is a Microsoft product that linux must be unconventional? Compatible and later surpassed. This is Microsoft's style and should also become linux's style, which should also be the style of all software. No matter how good linux is, you cannot ignore or deny the existence of Microsoft. Linux must acknowledge that at least he must be present with windows. A fresh and familiar interface is what linux should pursue, rather than a completely unfamiliar interface and operation, because no one likes to get lost.

2. I personally think that "habits" are not equal to "standards ". I didn't mean to argue with you. I just wanted to say the old saying: "Let's go on your own path and let others say it ." Similarly, if linux simply does not follow others' win path, but does it go through its own linux path, what's wrong? Here we will not discuss who is better than linux or windows, but about their advantages and disadvantages. Some people need win and some need lin. For example, if you have a driver's license but cannot drive a motorcycle, the same principle is true. Use what you like. No one is right or wrong. Don't get used to it. Just move away. I think that gnome can be completely customized into windows desktops. At least on my current computer, there seems to be almost no difference between the two systems.