Apple's display is one of the display with the least difference in print performance, Apple display is one of the most accurate display, Apple's operating system is the first to consider all application software compatible platform, the degree of compatibility is conceivable; Apple, as an independently developed operating system, Avoid disruptive factors such as viruses that can cause large areas of attack; Apple's crisp, clean shape pulls the distance between people and the machine, leaving the machine out of the cold (the reason why the World Industrial Design Awards Red Dot Award was won by Apple's translucent outer box display)
In addition, I would like to say, I think Apple's most successful is not the product, but Apple's brand marketing.
Is Apple's user experience really good? A product developed for the use of Western people is so suitable for us in the Orient? Crazy 4 that mirror bottom, a little water can not get up is his courage to innovate to bring us the Gospel (this innovation is to support the Apple as a camera of the additional functions of the memory)? Apple has done a lot of work on user experience, why is crazy 4 a single-tasking operating system? Does Apple's product look guide the design trend? Say the sour not to pull a few words, I feel the Apple enthusiasts to their apples made of those small accessories than the apple itself that the perpetual bathroom shape of the tide, and Apple's interactive guide to use the habit, I hear every day my side have crazy colleagues in the operation of their apples that love and hate sigh, So one more sour smacking words, so that Apple in the guidance of the use of habits rather than that he is forcing you to adapt to it, in terms of Apple's price and configuration, Apple's cost-effective is almost uncompetitive ...
I always feel that as Apple is not normal phenomenon of the bad street, really everyone because Apple is good to buy, and not because he is a symbol of the tide?
--------------------------------------------
For a long time not to go on, come back and continue to explore, and acknowledge the impropriety of his previous remarks
When I see a friend suggesting that I go to the Apple product and say it again, here's how I have or have used all the Apple devices from air to Nano,
The first thing to admit is that there's something wrong with a single-tasking operating system, and that Apple's single-tasking system does ensure smooth operation compared to Android's multitasking OS, especially after having been involved in Android and iOS app design, The smooth operation of a certain length of the user experience is a guarantee, in addition to the iOS system non-open and AppStore audit system also guarantees its application of the normative and quality sense, while in the design also show the environment is the only easy to design production, I believe that every Android-made design has a headache for his multifarious screen compatibility.
One more time forget to mention that Apple has an invincible place for sound quality ~ now think of it as a reason why designers like him,
Third, the balance of hardware equipment is better than other devices, this benefit more reflected in the mobile phone, here also to admit that Apple configuration is not afraid of the competitiveness of the one-sided error, apart from the look is really not as good as the Android and Nokia, but in the comprehensive experience, especially the imaging effect, Apple really surprises us (better than the card machine with its pixels, compared to iphoe4s800 and Fuji F100 12 million).
On the interaction, during this period of work, I found a very interesting app design phenomenon, many of the current app design process is often the first development of iOS version, and then in order to maintain the unity of the app will be the iOS version of the design directly to the Android version, not for Android design, Does this phenomenon promote the way Apple interacts to some extent, whether or not that interaction is really good? The real interaction, of course, lies in the app design team itself, which is just a small conjecture about new discoveries.
In recent years, the continuous revision of Android, in the system's interactive mode does not exclude the phenomenon of close to the apple, regardless of what is the reason, the conclusion must be that we have been the Apple Church how to operate, regardless of this operation is really in line with our operating habits ~
But other questions I feel I'm not completely wrong, no one product is perfect, Steve Jobs is like God but is still a person in nature!
I was in iphone4 after the return to the Android phone (I also think that there are many bad Android, stability is a worry people), my Apple device is still used to evaluate the design effect and debugging, the real work is still dependent on the PC and Windows, and I believe most people and I have been like. Does this also explain why Apple is still rich, has a product, has the identity of the symbol.
Think about the recruitment requirements of the design company ~ a result is often caused by multiple reasons.
I have always believed that Apple's marketing strategy is best worth learning from every company!
Why web designers like to use Apple's computer