Bai hundred what lawsuit no secret, shun net public apology compensation for more than 130,000 yuan

Reporter learned that Chaoyang court judgement Bai Baiho win, shun nets need to publicly apologize, and compensation for its economic losses and spiritual damage relief, such as a total of more than 130,000 yuan, "no secret app" software operators do not constitute infringement.

White hundred what claim 800,000

Last July, a social networking site operated by an anonymous user in Shenzhen's two-wood company posted "no secret app" posting, "White Lily was found in a luxury shop, in Shanghai, what did she think?" After shun net also concocted the title of "Bai Hundred what to steal shun 600 yuan luxury white hundred what steal something has a criminal record for theft was expelled" article.

Bai Baiho that the two defendants ' actions seriously interfered with their normal work and life. Two wood company as the source of libel speech, Shandong Shun Net company should bear joint and several liability. Therefore, the two defendants were asked to make a public apology, compensation for the economic loss of 500,000 yuan, spiritual loss of 300,000 yuan, the right to spend 10,000 yuan of reasonable costs.

Two defendants denied infringement

Shandong Shun Net company said, the company only reproduced, did not make substantial changes to the content reproduced, so far on the Internet can also browse to other media releases similar news, the company also did not receive a letter of attorney. After receiving the court summons, the company immediately to the alleged infringement of the Web page to take the deletion, shielding, disconnection and other measures, no infringement intent.

Shenzhen Two wood company is believed that the company has fulfilled the duty of care, and prompts users such as the release of the legal responsibility, and the user to the platform to send the text set corresponding monitoring and keyword review, filtering measures. It should not be held responsible.

Infringement of the court decision

The court believed that Shandong Shun net company issued the article title with the word affirmation, easy to make the public convinced that white lily theft, and the content of the article is not confirmed by the news report, and involved in the plaintiff's text content is also not positive evaluation, resulting in the plaintiff's social evaluation, thus constituting a reputation infringement

Because there is no evidence to prove that two wood company is aware of the user posted content infringement and did not take the necessary measures, so the company does not bear joint and several liability.