Cao Lin: low-rent housing funds have been diverted to make public rental more bubble

The National Audit Office 17th released 19 provinces from 2007 to 2009 the government investment in affordable housing audits survey results, in the focus of the survey of 32 cities, There are 6 cities and 4 counties to misappropriate 150 million yuan low-rent housing guarantee; 2132 of families who do not meet the conditions are subsidized or housing; 34 projects in 6 cities use false declaration materials and so on to get 61.29 million yuan in the central budget of newly-built low-rent housing; According to regulations, all localities from the land transfer net income to withdraw the proportion of low rent housing security funds shall not　　Less than 10%, but Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing and other 22 cities to extract the proportion did not meet the above requirements, the total number of these cities to extract less than 14.623 billion yuan. In the context of misappropriation of funds into a system of normality, when used in disaster relief funds are some places without psychological barriers to misappropriation, misappropriation of low-cost rental funds is not what news.　　I do not care about the cheap rental funds are diverted, but care about this "Low-cost rental funds are diverted" news, to prove another piece of the absurd news. On 17th, media reports said Ministry of Finance, the National Development and Reform Commission, Housing construction Ministry of the three ministries recently issued a document to allow all over the year to complete the task of low-rent housing security, under the premise of the land transfer of gold net income 10%, Provident Fund added to the low rent housing security funds and Low-cost housing Protection special grant funds,　　For the development of public rental housing-that is, to the local government from the low-cost housing funds to take money to support the public rental housing. "150 million yuan Low-cost rental protection gold was misappropriated" audit results, tantamount to the three ministries immediately to the red-headed poured a basin of cold water: the hope that the place from the low-rent housing funds to build public rental housing, not only the tiger's food and Tiger, is simply whimsical.　　That a little low-rent housing funds, all departments are eyeing, competing for misappropriation is not enough, feed also feed not enough, how can the benevolence to built public rental? The government's finances are largely land finance, and they are sold for money.　　Land transfer Gold is the lifeblood of local government finance, take out 10% for the development of public rental housing, free housing for low-income groups to live, that does not mean that some local government's life? Although in recent years all over the building of the security house, but many places are basically still outstanding. Some time ago, media reports said that although the central financial support for housing and housing projects in the 69.2 billion-yuan special grant has been issued all over the country, but to promote the enthusiasm of low-income housing is not high. For example, Beijing only completes the plan investment 53%--on the surface looks from the fund shortage, the deep-seated reason is under the property market regulation, everywhere is unwilling to lose the land income. Some scholars estimate that the loss of the local land transfer due to the construction of affordable housing is about 300 billion yuan.　　This is undoubtedly the meat that cuts the local finances. is the local government short of money? From the gross view, is not missing, the people's tax burden is increasing, the corresponding is the government revenue increase, coupled with the central financial transfer pay increase, the place is not lack of money. There is no shortage, mainly depends on what to do. In the big project, building the big square, in relation to official achievements and local image of the input, there are also like what official car and official reception, always is not bad money, extravagantly, even the state-level impoverished counties can toss out a few billion of funds to. Can be in no profits, no immediate return of the cause, is always short of money, like what education investment, health care, social security, environmental protection, always shout poor, a mention of "our national conditions."　　Low-rent housing construction, of course, belong to this cry poor place. In fact, the state of education and low-cost housing construction funds have never been less, but, after layers of Maur type of misappropriation, interception and occupation, the money to the place, many times no shadow. The analogy used by Jinhua, the former director of audit, central transfer payments, from the central department has been flowing to the village, the channel is very long, the canal is to "seepage" and was "river closure", and sometimes the water to the village without the--1.5 million Yuan Low-cost rental protection is diverted, it is such water seepage.　　Misappropriation to do, the report did not say, but can be imagined, of course, will not be diverted to the primary school teachers pay, help poor families pay tuition, for the elderly to send benefits. The construction of their own low-cost housing still owes a lot of money, and for the construction of low-cost housing funds have been diverted, but also expect them to spend the rest of the money to build more loss of public rental, it is water in the moon Mirror spent.