China to cut carbon emissions in first trial

Because of the view that the project Certification Body Beijing, China-Huawei Certification Co., Ltd. failed to produce timely examination opinions, as a result of their carbon emission reduction project developers can not complete the project requirements of customers, Shanghai Tai-Ya Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. will be Beijing move Huawei Certification Limited to the court, thus becoming China's carbon emission reduction industry's first case.　　This morning, the case in Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court open trial. It is understood that the contradictions of the two companies are the source of the Kyoto Protocol under the Global Emissions reduction Agreement.　　According to the agreement, companies can obtain carbon credits issued by relevant certification bodies through voluntary emission reduction projects and then gain profits by selling this amount. Two years ago, the company signed an agreement with the Zhejiang Energy Group Huaguang Water and Electricity Company limited to help the latter to deal with carbon emissions reduction, and if so, Huaguang water and electricity will receive nearly 300,000 euros of "extra revenue" a year.　　However, in accordance with the United Nations design of the carbon reduction market, the company must submit materials to the United Nations-designated certification body, the latter issued a voluntary emission reduction limit. To this end, the company has selected the international certification Body of the Norwegian Classification Society in Beijing, a subsidiary of the Beijing-China-Huawei Certification Co., Ltd. as the project's certification body, and signed the "Climate Change service agreement."　　According to the agreement, the company should be before November 19, 2009 to the company to provide the appropriate consideration, but until November 30, 2009, the company has issued a signing date of the company to be a negative "audited submissions." The Company believes that it is because the company failed to issue the agreed period within the deadline of the examination of the written submissions, only to cause its customers to the company's companies default.　　To this end, too than Jas company sued the company, request refund project validation costs more than 242,000 yuan, and written apology. In the course of the trial today, the company proposed that, according to its agreement with the company, they would only complete the validation before November 19, 2010, and there was no mandatory requirement to deliver the validation report before that date.　　And according to industry regulations, if the project owner to obtain a positive validation report, as long as the project validation period within the specified period of time, the project can be completed at all times, so their delivery on November 30 of the negative validation report does not have any impact on the company. The company believes that too much of the company is not satisfied with the delivery date of the validation report, but the negative conclusion of the report, the other side of the lawsuit is to allow its future projects to obtain a positive validation report. (Reporter Lisong Huang Jie intern Li Yanni)