Chinese Academy of Sciences adds more academician primaries

The news yesterday, the reporter learned from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011 academician of the Academy of Sciences co-opted the initial list of candidates announced, a total of 145 preliminary candidates.　　In May, the first public announcement of the list of candidates, a total of 314 people, that is, more than half of the people have been eliminated. The publication of the "2011 Academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to select a preliminary list of candidates" showed that among the 145 candidates, the oldest 76-Year-old, the youngest 40-year-old.　　Among them, the Department of Mathematics and Physics 21 people, the Ministry of Chemistry 23 People, the Division of Life Science and medicine 30 people, the Ministry of Geosciences 25, Information Technology Science Department 18 People, Scientific and technological department 28 people.　　After the publication of the list, netizens have further upgraded the qualification and selection of "academician" candidates. CAS issued a notice that the Academy of Sciences is a serious scientific honor group, academician co-opted work strictly in accordance with the co-opted procedures. The majority of the academician to the society's unhealthy tendencies, and oppose the co-opted work misconduct.　　The Chinese Academy of Sciences said that once found and verified that there are improper actors, will be seriously dealt with, welcomed the community supervision. Previously, the first round of the list of recommended candidates, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Geology and Geophysics Institute of Gezhenhao, because of his wife reported "bag Mistresses", had made uproar, eventually Gezhenhao for corruption was arrested.　　Gezhenhao did not appear on the preliminary list of candidates. It is understood that academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is the highest academic title in science and technology established by the State. Co-opted once every two years, the total quota of not more than 60 people.　　2011, the academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences was co-opted in January, and the results will be announced by the end of this year. Dialogue "later no longer candidates for the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Peking University life Sciences director Rao said, March is expected to not be elected to the new round of the list of candidates after the publication of the international reputation of neuroscience scientists, Peking University life Sciences Dean Rao defeated. Yesterday, the "top returnees" in the Science online blog said, "Henceforth not candidates for Chinese Academy of Sciences academician." For Rao's unsuccessful, yesterday, Chinese Academy of Sciences spokesman Li said, "The specific reason is not very clear."　　"At the same time, Li said, the majority of the academician community is excellent." Beijing News: Your blog said that after August 17 will no longer become a candidate.　　Do you really not join the academician candidate? Rao: This blog was written by me in March and is not expected to be elected and posted today. I do not do academician and continue scientific research, can motivate young people to concentrate on the academic not too much to see the fellows face.　　I can inspire fellow people who are not old enough to lay off research and have a passion for their relationship, and they may have some pressure to do some research and not be too backward.　　BEIJING News: What do you think about losing the election?　　Rao: Whether I am elected will not affect the academic and conscientious person to my evaluation, may affect is, people against my academician quality evaluation. Beijing News: What is the reason for not being elected?　　Is it hard enough? Rao: Ask someone else to know why. Any knowledgeable knowsWhether the condition is not enough, just look at the elected and other candidates will know.　　Beijing News: At the beginning of 2011, why did you accept the recommended candidate?　　Rao: I think we should accept the nominated recommendation, since 1996 I have introduced a number of Chinese scientists in the blog, I think the Academy has a good tradition of origin, and then there are very good people, so, even if some problems, posterity should be involved in order to improve from within. BEIJING News: What do you think of the academician's co-opted system now?　　What do you think of the title of academician? Rao: Academy of Sciences the honor of the executive power is a balance, the system will still exist for a long time, although some aspects should be changed.　　Similarly, when I do not participate, other people should participate, in this way, only one person to declare the line.　　Reaction Tsinghua University life Sciences Dean Shi "Rao lost, I was surprised" yesterday, the famous structural biologist, Tsinghua University life Sciences Dean Shi said that Rao was not included in the list of candidates, he was very surprised. "I don't know why. I personally think that the academic level of Rao is very high, full time before returning to the United States Northwestern University is a tenured professor. As far as I know, he should be the first professor in the field of life sciences to return full-time from a famous American university.　　"Shi Yi said that the 1995 Rao began to return to participate in domestic academic construction, especially for the Shanghai Institute of Neurology and the later Beijing Life sciences Institutes to build a lot of power." Shi said that over the past more than 10 years, despite Rao's outspoken and constructive comments and suggestions on the status of the entire Chinese scientific and technological community, his academic studies have not been delayed.　　Rao is never a prolific scientist, but he has a heavy weight in every academic paper. At the same time, Shi that the academician's selection, although the factors are more complex, but the academic level should be the main factor.　　So he didn't "understand" the Rao. The same is returned overseas by the Rao and the two people, many views coincide, known as "Gemini."　　Shi said he personally admires Rao and hopes Rao will continue to play a positive role in promoting the development of China's science and technology.　　Said Ark Son "Rao lost or because of maverick" yesterday, China's "technology crackdown on the first person," Fang said on Weibo, Rao should not have been to the election academician to be insulted by this, but in China not a member of the academician in many areas are limited. Ark Son in the interview with this reporter said, heard Rao lost news, to Rao academic level, the first round has not been brushed down, is really a very funny thing.　　Ark said, now some famous universities require the Dean of the school is academician, academician became a representative of power, the hands of a huge academic resources. In Fang's view, Rao is a unique personality, has a high status abroad, what words dare to say, offended a lot of people.　　Rao, he argues, has a lot to do with his maverick approach. This edition (except for the signatureOutside)/Our correspondent Zhong Yuwei intern Zhang Yaxu