Does writing an original article mean ranking?

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Outside the chain by Baidu constantly under the blow, now the webmaster are more or less the external chain construction has a new understanding. Slowly I also found that the webmaster network now has a lot to share articles are talking about the user experience are talking about the original content construction, and some tips on SEO optimization is slowly fading.

I think this phenomenon is still relatively good, after all, you and I know, sometimes in order to do a so-called outside the chain, our webmaster in the Internet really "contribute" too much useless information. Especially for Webmaster Forum class site and local forum class site impact is very huge. I believe that everyone can be seen everywhere a hair content is to do outside the chain of posts, such a chain effect how big? In the previous "Baidu tell you several common but can not do outside the chain" in fact, Baidu also gave us the answer, this way is called false recommendation true promotion, Baidu is considered to be low quality of the outside chain, Such an outside chain effect can be almost ignored.

And now, our thinking is slowly changing, slowly discard the past "chain for the Emperor" of the imprisoned thought, began to transfer to the content construction. So why to talk about the construction of original content? Does writing an original article mean ranking? In fact, I personally think this is also a misunderstanding.

I personally think that regardless of the chain construction or content construction, must go to clear direction, such as Baidu to determine whether a chain is the basis for value, your original article is not really recommended to your readers your users? If, like the previous article, the fake recommendation is really promoted, Such article users will not pay the search engine naturally will not.

Here I would also like to be particularly reminded to do SEO friends, in the previous article Baidu introduced some of the low quality of the chain in the case of almost all of our operating outside the chain of the construction of the way Baidu can identify, this is more "scary". So do not underestimate Baidu's external chain of judgment and the ability to identify content.

Of course, the ability to identify the original content Baidu is still not a hundred-percent recognition, but I think this is a trend. Green Luo algorithm external chain blow is a very good case, so do not rule out Baidu will be against false original low quality content of the blow.

Talking about false original, today in A5 also see a "We are not obsessed with the original" article, for the content of the article I do not comment. But I think this article or write a lot of webmaster to original content distressed voice. But I don't think I need to be too deliberate about original articles.

Really do not need to be too deliberate, because the original article does not necessarily bring you a good ranking, but to the user point of view, everyone is inclined to the site of the administrator to write the article, rather than always copying others or modify the content of others, because the same information on the Internet too much, users do not need too many platforms to understand.

I believe we all have such a question, why my site is the article is original, but Baidu is not included? About Baidu will go to include a what kind of content, the individual thought that the algorithm involved is still relatively complex, a sentence of two we also say not clear. But in Baidu Webmaster platform on an article titled "Construction Station Guide: Baidu think what kind of site more crawl and included value" article, I think there will be you want to know the answer. These articles want you to read and understand.

I think no matter which search engine is to support the original, but please do not create content for search engines, users do not like, search engines will abandon it. And your original article to want a good ranking is relatively difficult.

But in the end there is a problem is very noteworthy, because we do SEO is inseparable from the long tail keyword to do rankings, and long tail keyword function is very huge. So is it inconsistent with the original article? This is a more fun thing, you can not create content for search engines but to think about how to create effective long tail keywords. In fact, this will not contradict each other, the key lies in how you do the original content skillfully into the long tail keyword, I would like to do SEO a very interesting skills. About the long tail keyword, we'll explain in detail later.

Whether or not the original article can bring us a good ranking, I think we have to locate your content, of course, and your skills.

Sometimes think some friends write SEO article really good, but the title name is similar to "I do SEO diary record One", which is more fatal, because you can not be very good to the long tail keyword into the title, although the content of the user has reference value, but for the search engine speaking, There are almost no related search records.

Of course, many articles in my blog also have this situation, but if your site wants to be profitable, want to do rankings, please do not learn this blog, because my blog content is not for search engines to do, is to record their own SEO experience and do, is for and the majority of hobbies and concerns SEO webmaster share content and do, our positioning, not the same.

The above content is the next SEO blog original for you to provide the "do you mean to write original article is the ranking of" The relevant knowledge, welcome to exchange and sharing, reprint please specify the source and retain the original link: http://www.xia18.com/seo/42.html