Great progress has been made in the tort case of Panasonic electric engineering by Fang da Group

Grand Group (000055) has made significant progress in suing Matsushita electrician for violating the franchise of the Metro Shield door. Fang da Group has received the decision of the Patent Reexamination Committee of the State Intellectual Property Office, which is effective in maintaining the franchise of the Grand Group.　　This decision results in the big group Metro Shield door rights case has a key impact. According to the introduction, the subway screen door is the electromechanical integration of High-tech products, Square Large group is the earliest to engage in the development and manufacture of subway screen door Enterprises, the company since 1999 in the first entry into the subway screen door industry, in the human, financial and material investment is huge.　　After years of development, Fang da Group mastered the core technology of metro screen door, at present, the company declared and passed the first instance of the subway screen door patents have 197, of which 45 invention patents, in the declared patent has been authorized 139 patents, the total number of patents accounted for more than half of the domestic industry, at the same time with software copyright 4. However, since December 2006, Matsushita Electric electrician has been from the large group to dig technical leaders, structural engineers, control systems engineers and project management staff a total of 6 people, and stole the company's core technology shielding door. Matsushita electrician with these technical and management personnel mainly formed the Rail Transit Division, then in the market began to unfair competition.　　In this respect, Fang da Group filed an indictment to the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court in March 2010, suing Panasonic electrician (China) Co., Ltd. for violating two patents on the metro screen door of the Grand group.　　For the prosecution of the big group, Matsushita electrician has adopted the "Patent invalidation Declaration request" strategy, but the four reasons for the "Invalid declaration request" of the patent "retractable bearer connection device" of the large group of the company applied by Panasonic electrician are rejected by the patent Reexamination Committee of the State Intellectual Property Office. In this case, there are insiders analysis, with the industry's core technology upgrades, domestic enterprises more and more attention to the protection of intellectual property rights. In particular, the development of High-tech products enterprises, if not pay attention to the protection of intellectual property rights, may be a one-time brilliant, but not long-term, intellectual property protection and technological innovation is equally important. The case of the big Group v. Matsushita Electric has violated the patent right of its metro screen door, which provides a better reference model for the domestic enterprises to protect the intellectual property rights, and will also contribute to the establishment of the IPR protection mechanism of our enterprises.