Huatai Boberry Anonymous Report violation

July 31 An anonymous report appeared in a number of media reporter's mailbox, including the Shanghai Fund company Huatai Boberry two violations, including a bank of a branch of the deputy governor bribery and the sale of a one-time incentive to violate the rules.　　Yesterday, Huatai Boberry general manager Desmond Chan denied these statements.　　"There is no sealing fee," the anonymous report said, Huatai Boberry fund is suspected of "use of public funds, the preparation of false conference materials to cash," bribery of a Bank of a branch of the vice president. The matter with the August 3, 2009 established Huatai boberry Industry-leading fund, the fund in the market high full warehouse, suffered a market slump, set up only one months net worth once to 0.77 yuan.　　Subsequently, Huatai Boberry industry leading funds in the market rebound before the error to lighten, leading to investors suffered a large loss. The report letter pointed out that a bank of a branch of the deputy governor "due to the recommendation of customers to buy 10 million yuan industry-leading fund redemption after the loss of more than 2 million yuan, and constantly ask the company to compensate customer losses." To avoid contradictions, general manager Desmond Chan the matter to the company General Manager Assistant Shen Ming and Shandong regional Manager 晁某 processing.　　"The report letter said, Huatai Boberry fund has compiled a set of" with Weihai BOC Customer Exchange Meeting "False material, on September 25, 2009, secretly used public funds 165,000 yuan, one-time to a local hotel bank account, and through the hotel financial withdrawal cash paid to the vice president.　　Huatai Boberry general manager Desmond Chan pointed out that this is inconsistent with the facts, Huatai Boberry is to comply with the rules of the fund company, will not have such behavior.　　As for the reporting letter accusing him of "overstepping the authority" in investment management, Desmond Chan said that as general manager, he was responsible for any department problem, and the aim was to make the company a good one.　　Shen Ming, assistant general manager of the alleged bribery, said there was no such thing, and that his job did not include sales. Another employee Shandai Yang, who was accused of handling the job, left Boberry from Huatai in April.　　He told reporters that he had not handled such an incident and that he had not been responsible for the sale for a long time before leaving his job. "One-off incentive statement does not set up" March 15, 2010, the SFC promulgated the "Open Securities Investment fund sales costs management provisions" began to implement.　　According to the report, the Boberry, which began on May 17, 2010, was in breach of the provision for one-off payment. The report notes that, because of "fear of less than 200 million yuan new funds set the bottom line", at the behest of general manager Desmond Chan, the company has two times to send mail to all marketing personnel, the content is, "approved by the company leader, according to the region of a bank IPO sales, in accordance with 5 per thousand to give marketing costs, other channels in accordance with 3 per thousand."　　For the number of sales households reached more than 200 provinces, to give 20 yuan per household marketing costs, for publicity, promotion, training, meetings and other activities. According to the report, "the so-called activities are actually intended to (send) the regional manager to compile the false material, and then pass the thirdParty extracts cash directly to a bank's account manager. Only check the company's mail system and Finance department reimbursement records can be verified.　　According to statistics, such a disguised marketing incentive fees amounted to more than 2 million yuan. In response, Desmond Chan responded that these claims were false and that there was no basis for reporting letters similar to personal attacks.　　Shen Ming said the fund's sales have not yet closed, so the one-off incentive argument is not tenable. In addition, the reporter verified found that the report of the Mail also has obvious errors and omissions, including the financial department of a staff resignation, but the reporter called the Financial Department staff still on duty.