Jobs resigned as chief operating officer of CEO

"The man" has gone to the Apple still?　　US Silicon Valley legend Steve Jobs, 24th, wrote to Apple's board of directors, resigned as chief executive (CEO), Apple announced jobs resignation news, but he will be chairman of the company's board of directors, former chief operating officer Tim Cook to become Apple's new chief executive. It was no surprise that Mr. Jobs told the board that Tim Cook had succeeded the CEO. Because every time jobs got sick and left Apple for a while, it was Cook as the interim CEO.　　The highest rating of the world is that it seems that jobs never left. But this time Steve Jobs, the 1-dollar annual CEO, finally resigned permanently. Mr Jobs will remain chairman of Apple's board, a new seat for him, in the past, when the board Chairman's actual authority was shared by two directors, reminiscent of the Roman era. Returning to Apple from 1997, jobs can take 14 of dollars altogether.　　What he left behind was an Apple empire of the world's first market-capitalisation company.　　"Rightly," Apple's shares fell more than 2.66% per cent yesterday after the announcement, up from more than 5%.　　Did Steve's departure end in an era of personal or personal? Unfortunately, the day has finally arrived. "Steve Jobs said yesterday in his resignation letter to Apple's board," If I fail to perform the duties of CEO, I will inform you first. " "It is clear to everyone that health is the only reason jobs left, although the word" health "was not mentioned in his letter of resignation. But aside from the accident that was squeezed out more than 20 years ago, Jobs had little reason to leave Apple. Rumor has it that his condition has not been very good in the past few weeks.　　He often comes to the office, but spends most of his time talking to the board members about the details of his resignation.　　14 years to pay =? If it were for the money, jobs might not be there. In January this year, Apple's announcement confirmed that Jobs's annual salary was 1 dollars in 2010, and that there was no additional equity reward for the huge success of 2010. Moreover, his 55 million shares have never been seen since 1997.　　In addition to the 1999 plane that was awarded as a reward, he did not use it very much. So how does he pay for his daily expenses and buy thousand years of unchanging black collar sweaters and jeans? Apple, of course, will reimburse him for some of his expenses, such as the $800,000 medical bill he spent in 2008 on his 6-month exit from his illness.　　But what about a multinational company boss?　　That is not a big deal, compared with the $48 million he gets from the 138 million-share Disney stock (the Pixar animation company he created and the Disney's biggest natural shareholder). None of the CEOs would have asked for any financial rewards for their company, like jobs. "Jobs is the most magical person in the world. "Even John--1983 jobs from PepsiThe company asked if he would like to "sell sugar syrup or change the world" CEO, instead of being kicked out of Apple dramatically by Sculley--and writing emails to a website--Jobs was a man of uncompromising grace who changed the world with one's life and lifelong passion. In fact, he made us smile by his crazy and great products. He did it.　　"Ipod,iphone,ipad,imac ...　　Apple-jobs =? Apple-jobs =? The uncertain answer is what most people want to know when jobs leave.　　Whether Apple, who left jobs, can continue to maintain global market capitalisation, and crucially, will Apple continue to work on the idea of creating high-end products that are increasingly linked to people's lives? Mr. Cook, who took his helmet from jobs, became the new CEO immediately after his departure. As with any dynasty, a successor means both inheritance and innovation. You know, Apple's many innovations in the last 3 years have been achieved in a situation that jobs didn't. Some may say that his thoughts (which can be explored in a book) are already with Apple, and that the others are walking along his route to succeed.　　Others are in opposition, so it doesn't matter whether or not jobs as an individual. Take a look at Apple stock's 30-year trend, with the most obvious two turning points in 1997 and 2007 respectively. In 1997, Mr. Jobs became CEO of Apple, making a series of strategic plans, the first to be effective is the 2009-year imac selling. After the first iphone launch in 2007, Apple's shares ran wild, though there had been shocks, but the upward trend had never changed, and the growth rate had made all other companies blush. If you analyze the details, it's not hard to see that 2007 years of important product launches will be accompanied by a rise in share prices.　　Apple's market capitalisation overtook Microsoft in 2010, and Apple became the world's most valuable company by two degrees in August 2011. It is true that Mr Jobs can shake the stock market with his own influence, and there is an amazing side to it, and there is a fear that if the person leaves the company, will everything be as usual?　　The market choice tells us that the answer is no.　　Can Apple replicate it successfully? To be a little emotional, the world will never find a second visionary, paranoid like Steve Jobs. The problem is that any individual will eventually disappear into the historical arena, and can Apple succeed in reproducing it?　　Jobs is not really a person. There are comments that jobs is not a technician and admits he doesn't know much about technology. Even calling it a designer is a bit far-fetched. But he did have a very advanced idea, but at the time he was not optimistic enough to think that his ideas could be ahead of decades. What jobs offers Apple is a guiding ideology and strong oversight. People want to see job.The launch of the Conference, but even if he is gifted, it is Apple's collective ideas, and jobs rehearsed several times before the effect. The pattern of Jobs ' launch is now being emulated by even domestic CEOs, not to mention the proximity of Apple's other executives. The team, led by Mr. Jobs, built the entire operating philosophy for Apple, and has now proved to be so successful. Products, as many have already mentioned--at least for the next 5 years Apple's product plan has been established, and Apple has never lacked the talent and details of the design of the king, Ivy and Cook's achievements are obvious to all. Brilliance can continue, replication is not inevitable.　　Someone in another company who wants to surpass Apple is obviously facing an insurmountable snowy mountain. From creating Apple, leading the company, saving the company in Fire and fire, leading the company to glory, jobs personal as "performer" role of the task has been completed, the rest, only need the spirit. The healthy Bill Gates has long since let the younger generation fight, the sickly jobs have the reason to have a good rest.　　Even seeing a black collar sweater at a press conference this fall will not change the way people think about apple = jobs.　　He's either a CEO or not, and that person is always Steve Jobs. Newspaper reporter Chen Xu