Millet music to scold war not rest, millet piracy rational music, evidence of anger

In fact, on the Internet, there will never be a lack of verbal warfare, and these are difficult to distinguish between true and false, the combination of "Shing", the full attraction of many people's eyes. is now, music and millet is for the copyright, the two sides of the war of words is the same.

First of all, from the music to see the formal prosecution of the "Masan Chuan", "lovelorn 33 days" and other 10 film and television works, and then won, the court ruling Millet will bear joint and several liability, while compensation for the loss of video network 150,000 yuan;

Subsequently, the millet issued a statement, said in the statement that the Millet box access video content is legal compliance, and ICNTV future television has now terminated with the music company licensing cooperation; And the video and Internet television broadcast control license side of CCTV CNTV's future television cooperation between the two parties have never terminated, le see accused Millet is public disinformation ready to divert attention.

Le view millet and the saliva war development to now, it seems that the climax has not set off. and financial weekly reporter call Millet, Millet said, for this decision, millet will likely appeal.

But le see also no weakness in the public said, Le View has been more than 500 dozen millet stolen video of the exclusive TV play evidence. And in the statement said: "As of today, we still find a large number of music network exclusive copyright TV dramas are being stolen by millet, its infringement has not stopped." ”

The show may be in the back.

Happy to continue suing

Le Vision was thoroughly angered by millet.

The reason is that Millet received a verdict, issued a statement that the Millet box access to the content of the legal compliance, and revealed that because music does not strictly comply with the management requirements of radio and television, ICNTV has ceased to cooperate with the licensing company license.

Millet in June 30 issued a statement, said recently about the company to violate the information network to disseminate the right to prosecute Icntv, and the millet as a joint and several responsible party, ICNTV Future television to understand, Le Vision Company and ICNTV Future television has been content cooperation, As the video box and TV products in the broadcast control and the content of the film did not strictly comply with the management requirements of radio and television, ICNTV future television has terminated with the music company licensing cooperation, but the content of cooperation in accordance with the original contract to continue to implement.

Millet insiders also told the Financial Weekly reporter that the company is discussing the decision of the first instance of the facts and the scope of law applicable, it is likely to appeal.

The next day, for Millet issued this statement, Le View to give retort, once again: music and television broadcast control licensing party CCTV CNTV's future television cooperation has never terminated, accusing Millet public disinformation diversion. It is reported that with the diversification of the music network products, the licensing side of cooperation is also a trend of diversification, the current 60-inch video network television or the future of the license plate.

The war of words grew hotter.

July 3, le Vision Network business Group operating president Goofy to the media that the company's response to the defeat is evasive, he pointed out that millet through the IC NTV platform to achieve the tort is only part of the infringement, there are a lot of content and icntv unrelated. Also said this week, the network will continue to the millet dozens of exclusive film and television drama infringement of copyright litigation.

The copyright of millet piracy charges to users

In fact, this is not the first time that millet was stolen by the prosecution, before there have been including the heyday of the Sun, Youku (23.7, 0.10, 0.42%), thunder, including several companies to sue Millet and the future of television, but millet easily escaped responsibility, by the future of television accountability.

Millet is the shield of SARFT 181th documents, according to the SARFT 181th document requirements, millet box must be licensed with the Internet TV Broadcast control platform (future television) to cooperate, and only through the broadcast control platform access to video content, to protect legal compliance. In other words, millet itself is only hardware manufacturers and distributors, not content providers, content by the future television companies unilaterally, solely responsible for the review, through the integrated Broadcast control platform and network directly to the end users, so there is no infringement behavior.

Millet is not responsible for the establishment of the premise is: Millet did not steal the copyright profit.

"Before the heyday of the sun and Millet also had a lawsuit, and then the future of television responsibility." From the beginning of investigation and evidence, we have a fine distinction. We have two forensics, the first is the end of last year, we carried out a millet box notary, at that time there are more than 200 works, and then continuously to the millet box and the future of television letters, request to give the processing. Not only did they not process the line, in the last 3 April, Millet also uploaded a toll channel, is paid with the rice coins. This kind of case is reflected in the toll channel, and is broadcast by the way of the charge on demand, this distinguishes in the case of flourishing sun, millet should bear responsibility. Liu, the law department of the Music Network, told the Financial weekly reporter.

Liu that article 181th is an administrative regulation, which mainly involves the use of equipment with the broadcast platform, and does not mention any copyright issues. Millet infringement is a legal issue, not a policy issue.

Millet to profit by piracy, how can television in the future be blind?

"From the business model, there must be a split between the two, using the virtual currency of millet to exchange out the proceeds, the two sides should be divided into percentages, the specific number of percentages do not know." A person familiar with the matter told reporters.

Fine Total 410,000

After the verdict, millet external voice Senqui, the future of television has remained silent.

Public opinion that the main responsibility of the incident should be responsible for future television, Millet is a joint and several liability. Millet has been saying that he is a joint responsibility. But we still think of both as a device manufacturer and as a content platform for one of the joint operators. Although the broadcast platform is the future of television, but with the payment of rice coins, millet is involved in the operation, with the millet charging system for the management and exchange of virtual currency. Since the fees are charged, we should not shirk the responsibility. Judging from the judgment of the first instance, it is the division of tort Liability, and the two parties take part of responsibility according to their own actions. is not the primary and secondary responsibility, the verdict is also very clear, the two sides jointly bear responsibility, not divided into major and secondary responsibilities. Liu explained.

According to Liu, the video network has prosecuted a total of 10 cases, of which 3 is the future of television responsibility, the other 7 is millet and the future of the joint responsibility of television, the overall decision amount is 410,000, millet penalty 150,000. But apart from the amount of compensation for the 3 cases of future television alone, the 7 basic sums shared by the two sides are equally divided.

"There is no comment on the verdict, no appeal or negotiation," he said. The future of television in the heyday of the Sun case, also submitted a similar description of the document that it should bear all the responsibility, it is the main difference in the heyday of the sun, Millet is no charge, we this case, Millet is uploaded pay channel. Liu continued.

In the face of millet continue to appeal attitude, Liu that the network will adhere to the recognition of support for the first instance of the court's ruling, and may bring up a new lawsuit, let Millet admit this fact.

"Millet must belong to the rogue companies, the lawsuit after losing also sow discord." Lei to do anti-virus software origin, is a rogue thinking, the last two years, the content of copyright has been vigorously protected, the future to do the hardware want to do content, must pay the price. You can't just use rogue logic to steal other people's things. "A media industry analyst told reporters that he believes that the copyright dispute is conducive to the formal video industry to achieve standardized management, the content industry is a great boon, the value of the content has been a greater degree of reconstruction and the release of value."