Public hot discussion on the bill of travel tax it's better to levy a fuel tax

BCC Beijing November 4 News According to the voice of China "Yang Guang News" reported that October 29, the National People's Congress office in the Chinese online published the full text of the "People's Republic of China Travel Tax Law (draft)" to the community to solicit opinions. The publication of the bill not only aroused heated debate in the industry, but also aroused ordinary people's opposition to its obvious price increases and tax increases.　　Details We connect CCTV reporter Wang Qun.　　Moderator: What are the provisions of this draft law more dissatisfied? Reporter: There are two aspects, the first is mainly on the draft of the travel tax to pay by displacement, rather than according to the price rating some objections. According to the content of this draft, an example, a Passat 2.0L model, the price is cheaper than the 1.8T model, but pay a higher travel tax, because it is 2.0L. Because the gold content of the brand and technology is different, A FAW Volkswagen Audi Q5 's 2.0T car price is 20.3 million yuan higher than Dongfeng Nissan's chook 2.0L model, but both of the travel tax paid in the 2.0L, the same amount of tax, there seems to be some unreasonable, and can not reflect the fairness of property tax, and from the property tax itself should be around the value of equity to measure, such a row　　The method of tax collection is unfair. There is also some controversy about the purpose of the draft. Because some consumers have pointed out that, according to the bill, the passenger car travel tax is to be levied according to the displacement of seven grades, the higher the discharge, the more taxes paid. The problem is that the travel tax is a property tax, and since it is a property tax, the tax should be based on the value of the vehicle, not the vehicle's displacement. According to the displacement of the travel tax levy, distorted the nature of the travel tax, and the use of vehicles in the process, the actual value of the year is decreasing, so the travel tax should be reduced year by year, and can not pay the same travel tax.　　Therefore, the bill is to save energy and reduce emissions, or disguised fees, consumers have doubts. Moderator: What impact will the draft release have on the future development of the automotive market?　　What experiences can be drawn from developed countries in solving this problem? Reporter: Needless to say is in the future, even if the draft has just been published, according to several portal sites and brand car outlet shops conducted by the consumer survey, there are some data show the impact. 47.8% of consumers said that the introduction of the bill would give him a temporary waiver of the plan to buy cars, nearly half of consumers have the intention to temporarily do not buy a car. Many respondents think that to achieve the goal of energy saving and emission reduction, it is more reasonable to levy a fuel tax.　　The guiding role of energy-saving emission reduction, in fact, should be adjusted by the fuel tax, the car runs much, emissions of more exhaust, it should be more tax, fuel is the driving force of the car, the adjustment of fuel tax on consumers to buy more influence, the actual energy-saving emission reduction objectives more effective. From the experience of developed countries, the travel tax should be compressed, or simply be merged into the fuel tax, such as Britain, the United States and other developed countries also attach great importance to private cars in theWith the link on the tax, but are not fixed tax, are through the fuel tax to achieve more open and more pay, less open less pay adjustment function. This approach leads directly to the people's wallet and the energy-saving characteristics of the car, with the mileage linked to the car, will be more than the travel tax to play a greater scientific energy-saving emission reduction role.