Abstract: It is really not a long speech, so I will not nonsense, directly on dry goods. Dry Goods One: recommend the diversity of the chain when the content on your site is useful to users, users will recommend to others, the recommended form may be varied. For example: Blog
It's really not going to be a long speech, so I'm not talking nonsense, just dry goods.
Dry one: Recommend the diversity of the chain
When the content on your site is useful to the user, the user will recommend it to others, the recommended form may be varied. For example: Blog outside the chain, friendship links, forums outside the chain ... Video chain I do not do, also do not recommend to do. So we should try to leave the link in different places, the outside chain do as users recommend.
Maybe you think the above said you already know, online also spread rotten, then I say you do not know. Since to simulate user recommendation, it is necessary to think of themselves as users, to stand in the user's point of view.
Users like the content of all sorts of strange, certainly not only like the content of your site, you will like others. Therefore, you can not send out the chain when you send out the chain, remember to send some others outside the chain.
Users like content is naturally valuable content, the content of the value of nature will not just a few users like. So your chain should not always be the same ID in the hair, but there are a lot of IDs, and the hair is not the same.
Users like content if you want to share nature is to the natural place to share, it is impossible to find a place. So we send out the chain must find ID grade high to hair, high grade description post more often go.
Users on the internet is basically for entertainment, do not expect users to share the site every day good content. So your ID hair of the things do not light outside the chain, usually more points useful content it.
Users share favorite content is naturally hope that more people like, get more people recognized. So your ID hair content must be someone involved in the interaction, as to how do you want to go.
Dry two: forum outside the chain of practice
The above things are most suitable for use in the forum, below I directly talk about the practice of the chain outside the forum.
Optimistic about the picture, content I casually write, anyway is to the forum to add a chain, the focus is the following related posts.
Before I said, an ID can not light hair outside the chain, must send something else, but also can not easily hair. So we should make reasonable use of these other posts, such as to do some of the relevant content of the post, but not outside the chain.
In the picture, those posts are not outside the chain, but will be automatically linked to the content of the link to send out the chain of posts. As for how to let these not add the chain of posts automatically linked to add outside the chain of the post will rely on keyword tags.
First of all, the chain to set 3 unique tags, such as "Holy Land 001", "Holy Land 002", "Holy Land 003" and then send 30 related posts, each label corresponding to 10 related posts, the idea of this, everyone free play it.
Dry three: How do I optimize
08 began to do SEO, remember at that time just choose a good word heap, and then use sardines brush flow can have rankings. Then everyone changed into a chain of crazy hair.
Now many people say that these things are outdated, is it really outdated?
I don't think so, the key is how to do it. I started playing micro-blogging since 11, basically do not do seo.
I always thought Baidu Webmaster tools can only check their own site outside the chain, a little embarrassing.
I have a basic knowledge of SEO to stay in the years ago, but I can still chatter around, because my content is not outdated.
Dry Goods Four: a passage I said
Optimize any type of Web site, you do not as a webmaster, also do not when you are users, but as a search engine.
What factors do you need to determine the content of the page to help users, and these factors are not a robot you can judge, the results can be accurate?
There may be some people who feel that it is contradictory to what I mentioned above, but there is nothing wrong with thinking it over.
We are standing in the perspective of the search engine to think about the problem, and search engines are standing in the user's point of view.
So we can also stand on the user's point of view, but not as a user, because search engines can never be users.
I think SEO thinking is more important than technology, such as Black Hat (I define it as a unique and effective strategy, not what you think the search engine does against the enemy) enough to lead the search engine algorithm for several years.