The bill calls for more than 80,000 opinions on how to make a reasonable travel tax

The National People's Congress official website hangs out "The travel tax Law (draft)" The request opinion draft has been more than a week. As at 5 o'clock in the afternoon yesterday, more than 85,000 views and suggestions from various sectors of the community were accumulated. When the "travel tax law" is implemented, how big is the tax burden on the owner? Can we really bring the car consumption to the road of energy conservation and environmental protection?　　The controversy surrounding the travel tax law (draft) is in full swing.　　Does the problem need not be adjusted? The new travel tax will be the passenger car according to the displacement of 7 gradient, 1.0 liters (including) to pay only 60 yuan to 360 yuan per year, compared with the previous version of the adjustment, a slight decline.　　Starting from 1.6 liters, the tax increases gradually, the highest level of 4.0 liters, the tax is 3600 to 5400 yuan.　　Shortly after the publication of the draft, Xinhua news agency questioned the travel tax three consecutive times, saying that the tax department could not regard private cars as "Tang", and that it would not make this year a substantial tax increase and the introduction of new taxes next year a normal state. Scholar Wang Shichang private car into "tang" people rich remote and the vehicle acquisition phase of the proportion of tax charges, the U.S. average of 4%, Japan is 6% to 11%, China is 30% to 35%.　　If people are regarded as "Tang", the so-called people's wealth is a vain talk.　　Dongdengwen, director of the Institute of Finance and Securities, Wuhan University of Science and Technology Now car exhaust more and more, air pollution, city congestion. The rich have several cars, and they are plundering or encroaching on the normal range of activities and traffic space of urban residents. Travel tax is the best means to curb high emissions, high energy consumption, pollution and a number of private car home. What is the crime of raising the travel tax to the general residents of the city?　　What is the bottom of the question of the tax increase?　　Question two is it science to grade by displacement? The draft has abolished the current "one-size-fits-all" approach, with passenger cars being designated as 7-file taxes, which are linked to the displacement of passenger cars, thus embodying incentives to conserve energy and reduce emissions.　　Proponents of the bill say it is a good way to encourage small-car cars, and opponents argue that the classification is inappropriate. The purpose of the collection of "GCWU" by netizens should be thorough and clear. If it is to save energy and reduce emissions, it should be like fuel tax in accordance with the fuel consumption levy, "less burning less, more burning more and more, do not burn no levy."　　If it is to "all rich and poor", should be in accordance with the purchase price or value of travel, and should be with the depreciation of the value of the travel year by yearly decline. The finance Minister Xuren the basis of the tax on the taxation of vehicles and vehicles according to the exhaust quantity in theory should be the evaluation value of travel, but the number of travel is huge and scattered in thousands of households, value evaluation difficult to operate.　　In order to facilitate the collection and administration, the draft adopts the method of taxing the exhaust quantity.　　Question three can play the role of energy saving and emission reduction?　　The introduction of the draft to a certain extent is to strengthen energy conservation and emission reduction, but the future can really play the role of energy saving and emission reduction?Liu Huan, deputy dean of Taxation College of Central University of Finance and economics the best way is to fuel taxes. The experience of countries shows that the best way to embody the role of energy saving and emission reduction is fuel tax. After the increase in fuel tax, large-volume cars pay more taxes, small cars pay less tax, more driving will pay more tax.　　I do not think it is particularly appropriate to use other taxes to embody this concept. 3.6-litre car owner Mr. Wang big displacement cars may not be environmentally friendly the size of passenger cars is not the only criterion to judge environmental protection.　　Now many luxury car companies are developing and launching new technology, many large-scale vehicles are using turbo, hybrid and intelligent transmission technology, not necessarily smaller than the exhaust emissions of vehicles.　　Question Four can smaller cars be more favored?　　From the content of the draft, 1.0 litres (including) of passenger cars pay a travel tax of 60 to 360 yuan each year, 1.0 liters to 1.6 litres (including) of passenger vehicles each year to pay a travel tax of 360 yuan to 660 yuan.　　These two models account for about 58% of the total number of existing passenger cars.　　Tridong, Deputy Secretary-General of the Federation, to buy more than 1 liters of micro-cars more ordinary consumers are sensitive to the cost of keeping, after all, it is everyone's common idea to pay less tax, the idea will directly affect the idea of home buyers, so buy more than 1 liters of micro-car consumer groups more　　Auto Circulation Association Under-Secretary-General Rollei New energy models should be tax-free if the draft is intended to promote energy conservation and emission reduction, then small-displacement models and new energy models should significantly reduce taxes, or even tax exemption.　　Question five "sandwich layer" burden increase how much? In the draft, a medium-displacement vehicle with an emissions rate of 1.6 liters to 2.5 litres accounted for about 39% of the total passenger car, with a higher tax burden than the current standard.　　Of these, 1.6 liters to 2.0 litres (including) were adjusted to 660 to 960 yuan, 2.0 to 2.5 litres (including) adjusted to 960 to 1620 yuan. Auto Circulation Association Under-Secretary-General Rollei difficult to change consumer car choice This two-year first-tier city into the transfer peak, 1.6 liters to 2.5-liter mid-range displacement car has become the main car cars, sales are also growing trend.　　Although the travel tax reflects on the small displacement car tilt, but the preferential margin is not obvious, it is difficult to shake the consumer car choice.　　New June Wei 2.0L owner Zhao more money in the heart of the taste in the draft, the 2.0-liter passenger car tax changed to 960 yuan, although more than the original pay less than 500 yuan, can withstand, but if the rising oil prices and other car costs, the heart is not the taste.　　Can the problem be suppressed by six large displacement vehicles? According to the draft, large-displacement vehicles than in-vehicle tax increase is most obvious, 2.5 liters to 3.0 litres (including) of passenger cars to pay 1620 to 2460 yuan each year, 3.0 liters to 4.0 litres (including) of passenger cars each year to pay 2460 yuan to 3600 yuan 4.0 litres of passenger cars pay 3600 to 5400 yuan each year. These three parts of the vehicle account for the existing multiplicationAbout 3% of the total number of cars. Bohai Securities car researcher Shaolin difficult to affect the large displacement car consumption, the more expensive the car, especially more than 4.0 liters of luxury cars most of the price of more than million yuan, this part of the consumer group is not sensitive to price, each year more than thousands of yuan travel tax insignificant. The real affected is the mid-range displacement car consumer groups. Now the main model of large and medium-sized cities is the displacement of 1.6 liters to 2.0 litres of private cars.　　After the introduction of the new travel tax, families without cars can also be cautious, and most families that already have cars can only increase their burdens. Morning News reporter Shi Liu Zhoo financial morning tan public transparency with good travel tax is equally important Shi just as the "travel tax Law (draft)" triggered a social hot debate, another message is also highly publicized.　　The Ministry of Environmental Protection recently released the report of China motor Vehicle pollution prevention and control, statistics show that last year, One-third of the city's air quality is substandard, motor vehicle exhaust is the main culprit. 2009, the National Motor vehicle holdings nearly 170 million vehicles, compared with 1980, increased by 25 times times. The accompanying is that last year, the national vehicle emissions of 51.433 million tons of pollutants, motor vehicle exhaust emissions have become the main source of air pollution in large and medium-sized cities.　　Air pollution in many cities, especially in large cities, has been characterized by soot-type and automobile exhaust compound pollution, which aggravates the difficulty of pollution control. The basic purpose of levying travel tax is to solve the problem of environmental pollution. However, as a result of the travel tax relationship with tens of thousands of households, so the owner of motor vehicles, travel tax will be levied in the future? How does law show more fairness? Reasonable, fair and lawful tax revenue embodies social equity and justice.　　In addition, our tax purpose is "take from the people, with the people", the levy of travel tax is very important, how to use the travel tax is good, the same art. Therefore, if we have a wide range of opinions on the use of travel tax, so that people can participate in the discussion, we will work out a mechanism for the use and supervision of travel tax, so that the travel tax will be used in urban public transport and clean fuel supply, thus alleviating the impact of motor vehicle emissions on the atmosphere If the travel tax is dedicated to the use of public transparency, to the vast number of taxpayers a clear use of the list, I believe that travel tax will be the owner and the community more understanding and support.