The Ministry of Civil Affairs affirms that the public medical SHENMU model spends 330 yuan per year

The Ministry of Civil Affairs affirms that the "SHENMU model" according to the data of Shenmu, as long as the country spends 6% revenue can solve the medical problems the Ministry of Social Welfare and Charitable Promotion Division director Wang recently in "China's top ten Social policy innovation" results of the press conference, for the Shaanxi SHENMU Universal free medical value. Before that, he said, the mainstream voice of the intelligentsia was the negation of the divine tree, on the grounds that Shenmu's economic development was difficult to emulate, and that sustainability was questionable. But Wang's accounting is: A year down the tree, the free medical expenses per person is 330 yuan, the whole country in accordance with the standard of SHENMU free medical treatment, 430 billion can be achieved-and in the annual revenue of 7 trillion, this can only show that "with money will not spend." Wang's conclusion is supporting the result of "Ten innovations of China's social policy".　　Include: Ningxia initiative old age allowance and vigorously promote a number of public services, Guangxi Fangchenggang first implementation of orphan minimum parenting standards.　　And in the past, people think that the developed areas to increase the impression of the people's livelihood is very different: Guangxi Fangchenggang is located in the southern border of Guangxi, belongs to less developed areas, Shaanxi Shenmu in the National Hundred Counties Comprehensive economic strength ranked only 92.　　Zhang Xiulan, dean of the School of Social development and public policy at Beijing Normal University, said some economists were afraid of the future of China's welfare policy, fearing that it would cause welfare sickness, so they did not do it, "when the Labor Protection Ordinance was enacted." In reality, China's GDP per capita is expected to reach 4000 trillion dollars this year. Wang said that the rapid growth of wealth and the reality of the people's livelihood contrasts with our social policy makers and researchers have a huge challenge. "Actually we didn't spend less, the problem was that money didn't go to the place. Education, for example, is spent on building buildings or on improving the treatment of teachers and students. ”