The public sued a number of banks for repeated withdrawals of ATM charges.

July 27 around 4 o'clock in the afternoon, the public Lin Yu to the Beijing Xicheng District Court filed a complaint, sued ICBC, ABC, CCB's Xizhimen branch repeatedly charged ATM machine across the bank withdrawal fees.　　At present Xicheng District People's Court has accepted the pleadings, will decide whether to file in seven working days. Lin Yu on its blog, said, "ATM repeat billing, have to sue the bank, brother can not endure it."　　He said he recently heard that bank ATM interbank withdrawals cost from 2 yuan to 4 yuan, he thought the more noteworthy problem is that ATM has a limit on money, so will be deducted several fees. July 27, Lin Yu with his ICBC card, the Construction Bank of Xizhimen branch of the ATM machine to withdraw 3300 yuan, because the maximum amount of money to withdraw is 2500 yuan. So he withdraws 2500 yuan and then continues to withdraw 800 yuan of cash. He thought the whole process was a transaction, but the bank charged two times, a total of 4 yuan.　　And he also made withdrawals in the Agricultural Bank, in addition to the withdrawal limit is different, for more than the withdrawal limit of the cross-bank withdrawals, ABC also charged two times handling charges. Lin Yu that the bank had repeated the charges, causing his account to be repeatedly deducted. As a result of the bank's withdrawal limit, the greater the amount of money to be taken, the greater the number of transactions that the bank has identified as a single transaction, and the higher the fees payable.　　He in two pleadings, ICBC, ABC, as well as ICBC, CCB listed as a joint defendant, respectively, to return the "overcharged" handling fee of RMB 2 yuan. Recently, some banks in some cities to adjust the same city ATM interbank withdrawal fees, from 2 yuan/pen to 4 yuan/pen. The price rise has been widely debated. (Li Yu girls)