1 Yuan, Artie, the shoe, the lawsuit.

First hung out 1 yuan a pair of Andy shoes led consumers to order, Dangdang followed by a system error for the refusal to cash.　　August 29 reporter learned that Beijing Dongcheng Court has been accepted Liu Ting, such as 7 consumers to Dangdang's prosecution, the 7 plaintiffs from Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Guangxi, Zhejiang, Hubei, Jiangsu, Shanghai and other fields. The origin of a pair of shoes to sell 1 yuan Dangdang the next day on the back of the morning of July 28, Dangdang a name for the sports and leisure franchise store introduced preferential activities, sales of 1 yuan a pair of Adidas clover casual shoes, and this pair of shoes in the entity stores price of 680 yuan. A large number of netizens flocked to purchase orders.　　But the next day, consumer orders were Dangdang canceled, they received a message from Dangdang: Orders in the goods out of stock, Dangdang therefore canceled this order. August 2, Dangdang officially apologized to consumers, and decided to give each of the next single consumer value of 200 yuan Dangdang consumer coupons.　　Dangdang's explanation for the matter is that the offer is due to employee error, so all orders must be canceled.　　Rights 7 Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit required Dangdang to fulfill the contract for Dangdang announced the treatment method, consumers are not satisfied, and spontaneously set up a "1 Yuan Andy Shoes rights group", jointly through the action of the rights.　　Consumers in the indictment said that the defendant Dangdang's behavior violates the provisions of the contract law, a serious infringement of their legitimate rights and interests, and therefore to the Court to request the defendant in accordance with the order content, continue to perform the contract, delivery of 2 pairs to 133 pairs of Adidas sports shoes.　　7 Plaintiffs this lawsuit request main content is, fulfills the contract, delivers 7 plaintiff's Adidas sports shoes, the total market value is approximately 200,000 yuan. Beijing Hanliang Law firm Hu Yihua Lawyers believe that the current network shopping market chaos, the site with 1 yuan and other very low prices to attract consumers "seconds to kill" thousand Yuan, million commodities are common, this is more to attract attention. Consumers from shop to buy goods, can be regarded as a legal effect of the contract, both sides should fulfill the responsibility, "otherwise, we should bear the responsibility of breach".　　According to the Beijing daily synchronization broadcast Dangdang face the most large-scale rights August 3, Dangdang on a Samsung mobile phone price of 110 yuan for sale, although the price of the commodity after an hour was corrected to 1100 yuan, but there are many consumers to purchase orders, but was told to cancel the order. August 9 Zero, Dangdang launched "When the Good Book good books 72 hours to buy" children's book promotions, including the original price of 1800 yuan, "What is" more than a set of parent-child books, to 50 yuan to sell the purchase price.　　Many consumers stay up in front of the computer to buy a single, but a few hours later, many of the buyers to participate in the purchase of the order has been canceled notice, this is 13 days Dangdang appeared in the third price Oolong incident. According to the Intellectual Property Center of China University of Law and Politics, Zhao occupy lawyers introduced by the August 9 "Dangdang Wrong Price gate" impact of many consumers haveThe establishment of collective advocacy organizations, the current number of participation in the rights has reached more than 1700 people, of which more than 520 people have paid litigation costs, the activist plan recently in Beijing Dongcheng court formally sued Dangdang. Zhao lawyers said the case will become the country's largest consumer rights case.