Cloud era, the analysis of the four major complaints cloud computing

You may disdain those who lost their personal computing power, they hate subscription services, do not even trust our security model, we are not optimistic about our reliability, and do not think that the existing broadband can be very good to connect to the cloud, all this does not matter : Because in the end you still will be a part of us, we are cloud computing, you can not resist.

Yes, there are still a lot of problems and a series of threats to cloud computing, but I believe this is a trend that can not be stopped. So no matter how much you hate the cloud now, you will be assimilated in the near future: It's inevitable that you're holding data from your personal computer, data from external devices and NAS devices and yelling into the cloud.

Opponents of cloud computing, whether you like or dislike cloud computing, the cloud computing era has come to you. You can not stop its arrival, it is as practiced Suction Star Dafa will generally take your data and user experience away. I still do not understand why cloud computing can make people feel scared. In my opinion, the cloud user experience is definitely better than the current user experience, and it has great advantages in terms of total assets and total cost of ownership. Maybe you will put forward the following four complaints, it does not matter, after listening to the author's answer maybe you will change your mind.

Complaint 1: If I move to the cloud, I will lose my personal computing power

In fact, this is not correct. If you move to the cloud, you will gain more personal computing power as your user experience needs to be backed up with powerful remote computing power and remote GPU computing power in the data center if you notice recent advances in desktop as a service , The companies offering remote computing capabilities include Microsoft's RemoteFX, Citrix XenApp, and VMware Horizon View.

Even if you feel lost personal computing capabilities, do not blame the cloud computing, to blame can only blame the progress of the technology industry led to more environmentally friendly and more energy-efficient localization, weird to blame the Tablet PC and smart phones and low-efficiency systems As well as other cheap endpoint devices, as these are the crux of the next generation of personal computing experiences.

Powerful workstations, PC desktops and heavy-duty notebooks are beginning to move in more and more subtle directions, such as Ultrabooks and tablets, and more devices are beginning to use ARM-based systems rather than traditional X86 systems.

Although the current system can support the running of local applications, as time goes by and the development of operating system and equipment evolution, future applications will support cloud-based deployment and use the new API interface, as Microsoft The API for Windows RT is also for iOS and Android.

Of course, you'll still have the need to run traditional CPU-intensive applications such as Photoshop, AutoCAD, and video editing without worrying that ISVs will still offer these applications, perhaps as legacy applications for users, It is also possible to put the application into the enterprise's private cloud to provide users with software services. Of course there are very few users still need workstations, but there will be less and less demand for such needs, less than manufacturers to abandon the market, while individuals will give consideration to the ultra-low cost of cloud computing equipment and give up workstations.

Maybe, we all heard such a debate: I am a game player, I need a real PC machine.

No, really, you do not need it. We do not care about your needs. Outdated PC gamers have been marginalized for years between smartphones, tablets and game consoles, and game publishers are keen to devote their resources to the development of games in mobile devices and consoles. Maybe in the next 10 years, hardcore game PCs have become collectibles, and they will quit the stage no matter what.

Complaint 2: Subscription Services will increase the cost of personal computing and applications

Sales based on a service subscription model may be the wrong way to develop an application independently. Undoubtedly, this is a brand new way to buy software that is purchased at a cost per person per year instead of using a license to purchase the software directly, but if we consider the long-term use of the user, the next four The cost of five years is likely to be more.

In fact, in the long run, software-as-a-service and software service subscription models will be less costly for both end-users and enterprise users, largely due to the savings in software maintenance and update costs, plus the elimination of Software piracy situation.

Content-creation suites such as the Office suite and Adobe CS6, as well as software such as Intuit Quickbooks Pro, require more money to build because of the huge amount of human resources they spend on development. Traditionally, it costs about $ 200-400 per PC, and it costs a fortune to upgrade in about four years.

Maybe you will endorse the end user license agreement, but instead use a copy of the software to install 10 PCs, maybe you downloaded the genuine installer, but the pirated licensed serial number was indeed used. Perhaps you are one of them, the author should say that you should pay for the software you use just like any other person, or you may choose to use free open source software like LibreOffice, which is developed for free people.

If you are a law-abiding citizen, you understand that software costs are a part of the business cost and you will have a budget for your IT needs so that your IT budget will be basically the same and may be cheaper.

There are still many advantages in the service subscription model, you can still continue to run the existing version of the software, will still get the appropriate software support, business applications for business lines on the business survival of small and medium enterprises, the key .

Complaint III: I do not believe in cloud computing security and integrity

As we all know, in the past few years, well-known cloud computing companies such as Amazon have cloud computing vulnerabilities and other issues have occurred, but a closer look at each fault occurs when an experience learning process, they are in accordance with the user signed a different Level service agreement implementation, but will not easily encounter these problems.

Add that I mean not just start-ups like Dropbox or Twitter-based companies that offer free services on cloud computing because of the number of security incidents they have. I'm talking about telecom operators, hosting service providers and strategic outsourcing vendors and software companies who have many years of experience in building public and private cloud products and are well-protected in a secure, enterprise-class data center .

You have to believe they have the ability to invest in state-of-the-art security technology, hiring the best trained security personnel to secure their storage and network connections to better help you isolate data while putting the maximum amount of money into their Redundant infrastructure to ensure your data integrity and business continuity.

Complaint IV: I do not think my bandwidth is enough

I believe in the era of cloud computing we all hear quite a few similar complaints: I live in a van running along the river; I live in sub-Saharan Africa; I hate the city government's deployment of broadband; I live in developing countries, Only GSM connection; the area I live in is always unable to provide me enough broadband connection cloud.

Yes, it really annoys people.

In fact, no one will believe that cloud computing and broadband programs will ensure that everyone in every country gets the same bandwidth because the government is always slow in infrastructure construction, but the bottom line is to ensure that most people The demand.

For most scenarios, cloud computing does not require much bandwidth resources, such as DaaS and remote applications and web services through optimized WAN protocols, cloud computing connections require less bandwidth resources, much lower than those of video On-demand and CD-quality music streaming.

Once the data settled in the cloud, basically do not need to move and transfer, because your needs is basically that it is on the cloud. But in fact, the cloud you use is diverse. You have the right to select the cloud your information is put into. Later, you can also transfer the data in the cloud to other clouds. The current Bandwidth resources can still be solved. However, if you want to put a lot of data into the cloud and calculate, the bandwidth is enough, the answer is NO.

This process can take years, perhaps longer, and overnight is impossible. We still face a lot of problems, such as video playback congestion and the monitoring of virtual machines and physical infrastructure on a large scale, all of which will eventually be solved.