From the design to the planning of the growth of the road

The following article occurred in 2008, at that time I have not been to Hangzhou, also did not enter the post Alibaba, Ucdchina began to spread, interactive design This term has not been spread, I was not interactive designers, nor product managers, nor in large companies, but in a hundred-scale software company, In a project group that does online Chinese teaching. At that time, just transferred from the design position to assume the position of product planning (then the title, perhaps the same as the current product manager?), one afternoon, the new income, and then summed up the written. At that time I have not relied on Sohu blog, but posted in the "Busy" this product, as a result, now, "busy" has ceased to exist, looking back for years, it seems that many innovative products have been annihilated, fortunately, the cool network was not allowed to reprint this article, also not be annihilated, so inadvertently encountered, and then think of this long article.

I do not often reprint articles, but reprinted their old article, also counted as a souvenir. The day before yesterday, in the "Few people walk the road" excerpts a passage, continuous encourage:

... I must go beyond what is present, and transcend the notion of being self-centered. The elimination of stereotypes arising from personal experience will lead to a mature understanding. This process consists of two steps: eliminating the familiar past and pursuing a fresh future. In the face of strange people, things and things, I need to let the past experience, the current needs and future expectations together to attend, common "consultation" to my needs and the reality of the assessment, make appropriate judgments and decisions ...

So is it that your own past summary should be eliminated? Sometimes, the time to review their past summary, thinking, and the existing comparison of their own, then the idea is still holding? Do the past summaries need to be updated? Does the dream of the past still exist? Are the lessons of the past still being met today? Have you ever been worth learning? Fortunately, there has been record Let this review itself become a mirror.

———————————————— a low-key split line ——————————————————————————

I changed my TM signature this morning: "Never say you're creative." Because you think of it, some people in the world must have thought of it and are doing it. ”

This afternoon on a website to see a sentence: "The internet has never lacked creativity, what really lacks is the ability to transform ideas into details."

Two words are similar to each other. Say the meaning of the same.

I used to meet a friend who wanted to start a business, had a very good idea, but lacked action. After a while, I found that the pattern on the Internet is already working, and more detailed than originally thought. Who stole our ideas? Is it true that a bosom friend is really hard to find?

That is because, you think at the same time, the world, there must be someone else is thinking about this problem, he is stronger than the point is that he realized that the idea, refined.

To the team within the transfer of a product planning and operation planning of the article, also want to use this noon time, said the product planning.

Let's talk about my experience first. After all, people do not plan at once. To tell you the truth, I will have a lot of software, such as:

Previously, my best software was CorelDRAW, used to draw vector graphics:

For example, I am in the electronic resume of the vector painting of a set of calendars. The representative flowers of 12 months were selected respectively and drawn with CorelDRAW:

The big picture of the flower:

Also drew a lot of such vector characters, entertain themselves:

And recently reviewed the works of CorelDRAW painting:

It was also due to sheer personal interest. Later to the time to eat their own food, found that these personal hobbies, it is difficult to be competitive, first, there is a specialized art colleges and universities to cultivate a large number of a large number of solid art skills and rich creative designers. Second, these illustrations to entertain themselves, if this is the industry, no longer have passion, will be very tired. And I study the major is the engineering category, because the professional in the intersection, the test stage, not responsible for the teaching design let us grasp the engineering aspects (such as packaging mechanics, packaging materials, packaging technology) seriously missing. By the time we graduated, the students in our department were in a very awkward position.

Fortunately, several people are interested in the design, but also self-study a lot of software. I am more fortunate, so I have 5 months before graduation, I have an internship in a publishing house. In the publishing house, to do junior middle school English teaching assistant magazine editor. I focus on with the art editor, the editor-in-chief also specially gave me the entire publishing house the best computer, 7k above quotes. Junior High School magazine requirements are interesting, the title of each article needs to be creative and design. Including shading design, cover design and so on. For one months, the feeling is still interesting, long time, feeling too boring, plus I also want to temporarily help the text editor review, look at small English letters see the eyes pain. If I keep doing this, my passion for graduating will soon fade. So in the afternoon of the signing of the formal contract, I decided not to hesitate to leave the greenhouse.

Combined with their own skills, is under the guidance of a predecessor, I began to turn to do web design.

Because it is not an art school graduate, did not go through the formal art design training, I do web design although some of the exaggerated appearance of the performance rendering, but also have their own strengths, is more concerned about the form of the content of the performance. The form is for content services. But many designers with amazing artistic design skills sometimes get the cart in the back. He is more concerned with the appearance, which sometimes sacrifices the content. I started to learn some code that was really scary, like HMTL and CSS, and then my CSS code was pretty good.

When I was doing web design, my PS got some improvement:

At that time, actually also considered the site planning, such as how to set up the column? How to divide the blocks? But most rely on the demands of customers and the thinking of project managers. Photoshop used to a certain stage, I found its infinite charm, the details of the exquisite to a pixel of the feeling is not experienced with CorelDRAW.

So I did some time UI design (user interface):

In my spare time, I continue my explorations and discoveries, and try, for example, to try the pixel painting:

Later, I found that web designers in China, is called art, in fact, is not simply the problem of addressing, but this call will limit development. When a customer to "art" to call you, he is difficult to respect your ideas and ideas, more often, you are a customer's hands, and he does not feel good. Customers want to express their ideas as much as possible, this is correct. Designers are all for customer service, as the form is to obey the content. I just started to have a bit of unhappiness with the client, and I can't stand to be too picky about the change of guidance, until now I think of that customer, still have a lingering fear, but this is a good lesson. Let me know the website design, how to communicate effectively with the customer.

Basic work requires a lot of energy, endless overtime, not stop the communication with customers, the design of the repeated changes, but the future development of people feel confused. I do Web design, can do to what extent? The art director at best. But that is not what I really want, I want to be able to more reflect my ideas and ideas, can make me more brain than hands-on work, can let me on the bus, bed, Park can think of work, rather than sitting in front of the computer.

At the end of 2006, considering the future development, I changed a company and have been doing it. Company recruit I came in without lack of art, look at my comprehensive quality and I described on the resume of the Career planning (project management, copy planning), so let me do a period of time animation design (scene guidance, animation synthesis, character design) and so on, and I am interested in new things, although the animation is not the direction I want to work, But it doesn't matter, so for a few months, I have a more familiar grasp of AS and flash software. When I arrived at the company, the animation program was basically finalized, and I just made some suggestions for the details. Not too much involved in planning work.

In the animation, I began to inadvertently become a person in charge. Because of the need for scene design, people design recommendations and planning work progress, animation in my hand, get the synthesis (the outsourcing side of the people, our staff to draw the scene, prepared audio and other materials) with a simple as script together into a lesson complete animation. I was not in charge of the web design until the 60 lessons were animated. As we have held many meetings during the production process, for some design I also put forward their own ideas, coupled with the quality of the animation and some of them added to the thinking of their own elements to let the leadership feel good, think I have the ability to plan, then let me try to do a plan, first of all, the use of our web site process, registration process, Purchase process planning. and personalized pages (my page), accounts, courseware list pages, learning processes, and so on.

Just start to do the planning, feel very mysterious, in fact, but to their own ideas with visual tools to show it. At first, I used Photoshop for conceptual design. Photoshop can do design, but do not do planning, because inadvertently I will add some design factors into, such as color collocation, icon, low efficiency, in the review of the planning case, the leadership is often focused on the page style, color matching and other elements of the appearance, It ignores the rationality of the framework itself and the information elements.

Photoshop is not easy to modify, and the last thing to do is just a picture, I need to write an additional document to illustrate. Later I thought of using Flash to do conceptual design, all the elements in Flash, the import of pictures to import pictures, some of the comments on the page can be easily through interactive function to achieve. For example, the description of a button, with a logo display, the mouse will be moved up the description box. Finally, for the browser 1:1 display, I embed this large flash into an empty Web page. At the end of the demo, you can use a Web page.

A big advantage of doing this demo is that you can simulate the actual application and organize multiple fragmented pages together. Compared with the final finished product, the art needs to be strengthened. and flash in the picture performance is not bad.

That time, I used this method to do a few project design, and let the leadership think I was planning material, at the same time found I have to write a copy of the foundation-because the concept of design is indispensable is copy. Therefore, I also temporarily undertook a number of promotional materials copy writing work. Because I do web planning, it is inevitable to become a web design of the owner of this piece. Web designers need to be able to reflect my ideas. So I turned from a web designer to a person who relies on ideas and solutions and basic management.

This change is satisfying to me, and this is what I envision as a career transition. I am no longer tied to the computer to do some work to rely on hand, but can borrow a piece of paper, a pen, to express my ideas. And then use the easy to understand the solution to persuade the leader, guide the designer to show in good form.

wrote a period of time copywriting, but also responsible for the management of a small team of 6 (here, I have already written a lot of, the results of a Web page error off, I now do not have the Evans, busy to be responsible for. In the future, we should study how to automatically save the content that has been written to the clipping thin when the system crashes, just like Sohu blog. ) includes two art designers, two courseware makers, and a flash interaction designer. Staffing is also available. Me, is responsible for the work plan to track, coordinate and deal with the problem, responsible for the report. It sounds simple, but it's a lot more effort to find out about team management. But now I want to--even if I wanted to do it well, I did it seriously, but there was no way to satisfy everyone, including myself. For example, I have stipulated that our group will meet on a weekly schedule, summarizing the work of last week, and defining the tasks for this week. After a few weeks, I was often called to discuss things in Monday, and then I replaced the meeting with a work plan. I had a diary, I hope everyone can write down this week's plans and tasks, halfway I have time to come to a standing meeting to communicate. I also conceived our study meeting every Wednesday, because most of our team is new, still in the learning stage, and everyone's interest in learning is very strong, some want to the development of management, the production staff want to follow the art design staff to learn web design, but also want to follow the Flash interactive learning as writing. I found the internal potential, so I wanted to divide into several specialized groups, the most interested and want to develop in this direction of the team leader, interested in the person to become the team member. Each week, each group submits a research direction, such as the similarities and differences between web design and UI design, and so on. Every Wednesday afternoon after work, use one hours of time we do share, by the group leader designated a person on stage to give us lectures. The people below ask questions and get answers. Such activities have successfully carried out three times, the response is also good, but later work a busy, certainly no way to carry out these seemingly no help activities, we added a period of time after the class, this activity has been dismissed. Also, I set up a cross management responsibility system, equivalent to the formation of several groups within the direction, such as recording, scene drawing, preview course production, and so on, each group has a person in charge, I only for this person to ask the question of this work. The person responsible as a role one, at the same time assigns him one to two disposable "subordinates", when he is busy in the work, the pressure is big, or needs the help to assign to subordinates to do. He is the manager in this direction. If the other direction, he is someone else's subordinates, by another person's assignment. Because the work that our project needs at the same time is biased at all stages, so this method does not run up to a problem. And it provides everyone's motivation. When a person is responsible for something, he is often able to show greater initiative and responsibility. And when I was in a meeting with the leader, I mentioned a job that would refer to "who is responsible,"Hope that their credit can be seen to be felt.

This method makes me work a lot of worry, they encounter with other departments need to coordinate problems, often can play the initiative, their own coordination, encounter problems and then come to me. However, because the company does not have performance appraisal system, no bonus, no punishment, work dry a little bit of the same, dry good dry bad, rely on the above measures, only a short time to motivate members, there is no corresponding material incentives, no one is willing to take the initiative to assume some responsibilities and tasks. Assigning tasks is bound to encounter some problems. Do management, inadvertently took up a lot of my time, sometimes, the end of the day I did not feel what to do, are running around, solve problems, coordinate work, sometimes leaders to talk to me, ask about the progress of work, I must also know everyone's work. There are reasons to explain the work that they can't do. To get resources and time, but also to deal with the art designers and developers of my program, and the new solution is often no way to calm down in the company, can only be forced to move to the home-although busy, worry, but still very substantial, Because I feel like I'm making progress.

With Flash for a period of time web planning, simple Web planning is actually based on a big idea and direction of the established foundation, now, these are not really the meaning of planning, but only the idea of leadership with visual tools to express, see is not with his expectations, Then give the art designers and developers to do reference and guidance. Do this planning, technical content is not high, also do not need too many instructions, everyone knows why to do so, the most important thing is from the UI design point of view to the appropriate location, design navigation and layout, biased to user use. Sometimes a picture is enough to explain the problem.

Later, I began to take over the independent and complex plan. such as Web site Resource library design. I need to add a lot of logical explanations to the picture to convince the whole team, especially the leadership: Why do I want to do this? Why do users like this? What are the purposes and functions of these columns? It even involves how to add and manage, eliminating the cost concerns of the leader over complex systems. The library contains too many pages, with flash rendering is not realistic, this time I began to use professional demo production tools: Axure RP, you can also try it. As he explained:

Axure can make it easy for people with no code to make a series of linked pages and show them to your customers and co-workers. In doing site planning is indeed unique advantage. The effect is also good:

For the purpose of conceptual design-conveying layout and elements, navigation design drafts are enough.

But the final version of the library is very different from the one I originally planned. One reason is that I got a new task because I finished my project and couldn't follow up on the development and design of the projects. Another reason is that some of the features and projects in the scenario are filtered because of the cost control and time constraints that the leadership has taken into account. Initially, I felt that this kind of hurt my enthusiasm, because some features I think the use will be very popular with users, but also can become our unique bright spot, but I think, this is all the planners will encounter the problem-the perfect plan, is unable to be passed.

Leaders always have a number of factors to limit these options, the most troubling is the "cost" and "time limit", as a fear of ordinary commercial companies, in the shortest possible time to pursue as many commercial interests is undoubtedly reasonable. Without long-term development plans and insufficient human and material support, it is difficult for leaders to make a decision to develop a perfect but uncertain odds. The contradiction between the two is understandable. When planning, we all want to be as idealistic as possible, the perfect solution, which is the value of our survival. But also according to the company's planning and investment scale, time constraints, the solution to the subtraction process.

The best way is to have a perfect version of the program, and then eventually generate a few steps away from the plan. The first phase, complete the leadership acceptable, the development cost is not big, second phase, third phase and then slowly optimize. Therefore, the plan must take into account where the leadership will be cut from where the project management awareness, a perfect distribution of the scheme to achieve.

As a library, although I have the awareness to analyze user needs, but still stay on the shallow level of conjecture. More on the basis of editors have been edited, organized the content of the material to design. If the content is not even, to imagine a product, is the product planning. For example, the company intends to add a teaching product based on existing teaching products, it is complementary with existing products, has its own characteristics and operating mode. For example, planning a set of online learning courseware. Planners must take into account market requirements: What type of product is popular? What content is required by the user? What's wrong with them? Can we become problem-solving solutions? Also consider the market competition: Is this product already there? How are they running? How do we transcend? How to avoid their deficiencies? How to form their own characteristics? Also consider how some background knowledge and theories are known to be planned, such as teaching theory, psychological theory, teaching methods, etc. Finally, but also consider the overall planning and design, the product has been, then the site to the corresponding revision, the use of the process will change, how to exit the new product? How to promote positioning? How to develop a new product system? How to get user feedback?

So I should have just entered the real planning phase. Today, the optical scheme has written nearly 200 pages, from early market research and analysis, competitor analysis, to instructional design, conceptual model design. I have a deeper understanding of planning. When you are trying to convince others, you must first convince yourself. The refinement of an idea must be visualized so that others can see it and be judged.

So here's the funny thing, I chose to do it in word after I tried it out on a demo tool. Word's drawing function and form are very powerful, which I have not experienced before. Word allows me to write while drawing, the workflow will not be disturbed, and can completely discard the appearance of the impact factors, so that reviewers more attention and content.

For example, in Word drawing:

Another example:

The above demo, which uses Word and other examples such as axture, is not called design, but is called prototype design. is the most convenient tool, in a relatively short period of time to show a product's main function modules, information elements, the approximate layout, but can not be meticulous to the real design of the point.

The reason is that it's not flattering, on the one hand, even the basic requirements have not been identified, even the basic information elements have not been discussed clearly before, if the beginning of the design, not only will distract the participants ' energies, so that everyone's attention to the interface is good-looking, color is good-looking, And no one is focused on what's really at the heart: information, the flow of use. On the other hand, although many small companies planning and design personnel are combined, but generally will, designers and planners should still be separated, our company is now separate. Designers are generally very talented and capable of interface performance, but he does not know enough about market demand and company development strategy, and designers do not want to participate effectively in a large number of discussion meetings and revise the program repeatedly. Therefore, since the planners and designers have a division of labor, in the conceptual design can not "rob the designer's rice bowl", can not do their own design plan. Otherwise, it will discourage the design staff's enthusiasm, but also virtually limit his play.

In our project, a little bit unsatisfactory, is that we have not yet discussed the functional framework, the boss has let me out of an interface style of the draft to show them. So the conceptual design above will be refined to one such point:

In addition to giving an outline of the interface to the artists, I have to design a variety of interactive ways, need to use dynamic performance. It's good to communicate with developers. The learned flash and HTML just can come in handy, for example in the practice of a type of design, how to interact with? Mouse over a word, what prompts, what is the hint button to do? These are modeled with Flash. At a glance.

Please forgive me for not sharing too many project details: I believe you can understand.

Of course, my ideal plan is, but there is no guarantee that I can do it. This is where I feel distressed. I think that's where all the planners are going to be upset. Planners are not the final decision-makers, but it is hard for decision-makers to think the whole process in the same way as planners.

The decision maker, the executive level, needs to grasp the macro strategy and fear to think about the details. Also afraid of complex descriptions, huge systems. If these people don't know too much about technology, it makes communication harder. Moreover, senior leadership is generally a bit of a "reading barrier", and can not expect a very good very detailed plan to impress him--in fact, he did not calm down to read carefully, he has no time and no mood, he wants to see the results, the sooner the better. He needs to control the cost, the less the better.

There is a simple idea, not called planning. Planning is to make a good idea to let everyone feel that the extent of implementation, and ultimately let things into reality, bringing the interests of enterprise chasing.

Planning is not a plan. One ignores the ability of enterprises to withstand, like castles in the castle, perfect and unrealistic.

The key factor in planning a run-off is motivation, not ideas. Admittedly, ideas are important for planning, but I think a good plan is a rigorous logic system and a practical action plan for the details. The focus should be on "zoned" or "planning", rather than "policy" as an idea.

The real planning is to take into account a variety of comprehensive factors, market conditions, market prospects, user needs, competitor analysis, but also need to carry out their own SWOT analysis, to know their strengths and weaknesses, and then how to grasp the market opportunities, but also take into account the strategic planning of enterprises: time and cost constraints- This is particularly important in small and medium-sized enterprises, if not considered, to come up with a perfect but difficult to achieve the solution, not only will not let the leaders have confidence, but the following will enter the extremely embarrassing situation-the action of the initiative.

I have a lot of reasons to follow this plan, but a leader's design and development needs to be "fast" to refute me. I think this is the question of a strategic approach, do you want to develop in the long run? Even if a simplified program development and implementation is very fast, but the development of the finished product is not differentiated without distinctive features and unique selling point products, and then continue to optimize, or even dig the east wall robbing, I am afraid the cost will be even greater.

The above is a summary of my work, but also to the planning of a little feeling, I have just entered the field of product planning a novice, hope to be able to get everyone's support and help to find a common interest in the interests of friends and grow together.

On the train, a man opposite asked me: What do you do for a job?

I answer: I am planning.

Although he nodded politely, the expression on his face was puzzled.

Yes, in the English-Chinese comparison of a variety of posts in a website, the word "plan" is not found in a long page of paper. Planning seems to encompass all work, but there is no specific concept. Many of the companies doing the site do not have a separate site planning jobs. Before I engaged in teaching Chinese as a foreign language product planning, I applied for a website to do the technology company, although the other side of the site planning, but told me that the site planning most of the work is done by the Web designer. Planning, but at the same time need him to have the ability to design, in the designer when there is no time to top, not much early work, but also to do some customer service work. I was knocked out of my ear. Now, that's a lot better. User-oriented design, will inevitably require designers to understand the needs of users, not only to the market demand manual, but also the product demand specification. The latter is the refinement of the former, is to the technical staff and designers reference. The former is also based on large and small conferences and demand research. Planners should not only be able to communicate with each other, but also to understand the popular and professional language described to different roles: customers, users, bosses, colleagues and so on.

Because it involves a variety of types of work, the comprehensive quality requirements are relatively high, and the whole project is the overall grasp, so planning and project management integration together. Now the design and planning gradually separated, and planning and management has gradually merged. Many product managers are at the same time responsible for product planning work, rather than directly leading a product planning role.

To be honest, planning is challenging and satisfying. Especially if your ideas are gradually being realized in the team's power, you will take the company's project as your own business. A lot of people in QQ say "so boring work", but from my start to do planning, I feel every day is a challenge and new opportunities. It will never be empty or boring. But the most dangerous thing is the same. It's when you go home at night you still miss the plan. Before going to bed at night will be inspired, so that sleep will not be steadfast. But the most challenging is not the high tension of the spirit, but

I can't help complaining. Is that you through the overall thinking, the whole heart into the analysis of the conclusions, but in a short meeting, was not put into thinking, but master the power of life and death of the bosses to evaluate. The scariest thing is that these immediate ideas are born very quickly--especially with the stimulus you already have. Moreover, these ideas are not consistent. They're all telling you what they think and forgetting what they're doing. If there is a product manager to lead the product planner a little better. Because the product manager has some rights after all, he can stand outside the program and communicate with the bosses, will be a unified opinion to you. However, in the absence of product managers, product planning only the responsibility has no right, can only argue, maintain the existing plans but still must listen to some strong point of view, sometimes even let many people to change the plan to change. When a solution slowly fails to reflect its own ideas, when you still have to worry about the idea that someone else's self is not very much in favor, and provides a logical description. The first one disappears the passion of the time, and secondly, there is a sense of contusion.

Such things are unavoidable in any project, and planners experience more. After countless fruitless discussion sessions, I was tempted to give up my thoughts and listen to the "highest-seated" person in command and learn to live wisely. After all, in order to maintain a point of argument with the bosses is not worth the candle. I always want to take the product as my own child, but the bosses are the people who really take the money to keep it. So, after all, it's someone else's stuff. But when I had this idea, I started to despise myself.

If a planner is not able to insist on some ideas, but with the wind down, then lost the meaning of planning. Completely reduced to a hand, a pair of ears, acting under orders. I think that some places, must insist on, product positioning, you are from what analysis? If you do not think at the meeting of a boss to put forward a new positioning, is it reasonable? Did you come up with the wrong logic?

Planning to be responsible. Do not fall in the wind and insist when necessary. But at the same time to improve is: communication skills. Yes, the skills of communication can not be improved for planners. Because sometimes the boss does not agree with your plan, perhaps just because he did not understand. It is more important than anything to change the way of communication in order to be more clear, to take less time to make him understand your intentions.

When writing a proposal, I wrote nearly 200 pages, of course, to the overall project, including the preface (project background, market opportunities), industry analysis, competitor analysis, SWOT analysis, instructional design chapters, conceptual design chapters, formal development and design of the division of labor and so on. Detail。 However, the boss will not be expected to be able to read over 200 pages of things. At the beginning of the project, I sent two emails a week to every boss. But then I realized that they didn't have time to read the e-mails. I will be the focus of the post, will be the emphasis of the word with bright colors. And every time you report, you have to prepare a PowerPoint presentation with the focus of the program. As shown on the right. This involves the question of how to do ppt--the necessary ability to do the planning. PPT can not be too much information on each page. Otherwise it will make people irritable and affect the reception of the core information.

If you want to do planning, be sure to have strong enough psychological endurance. To be able to accept different views and challenges. You have to accept these with a smile: puzzle, doubt, etc. You have to use the clearest language to answer these questions, you have to learn to adhere to also know how to give up. Principled but not too stubborn. Planning has a lot of hard quality, there are some soft requirements. To master the basic work software, help your solution to render, such as Photoshop, Office series, and so on. When it comes to interactive design, it's best to simulate interactions with flash. If you want to be a product manager at the same time, you will use some project management tools, such as Visio and so on, of course, Visio can also be used for prototyping. Soft requirements are described above, "Communication, principles, skills, psychological endurance and so on."

Sometimes, planners will face a lot of pressure. On the one hand, from communication, sometimes you feel that the boss is unreasonable, why always do not invest in the middle, not in the interim, to the end you call into the brain to come up with the overall plan, they began to picky, in addition to picky, also began to do cost planning, this can not achieve, that too troublesome, this is too complicated. You'll feel like you're stuck in a mire, trying to stick to your point of view--because you think it's an idea you've been through countless sleepless nights, but you don't have to listen to the command to change the plan to "mess up." This question, I believe many people have encountered. In fact, their own things, of course, are instinctively maintained. But think afterwards, perhaps other people's idea is just from the user's angle to think, as the saying goes: "The spectators." Perhaps the boss is afraid of too complex a system, and the client thinks so too. So, be calm and accept everything. Go back and try to think, if the change is really unfavorable to the project, the discard is still to be abandoned, after all, the boss is planning the brain, not the hands of planners, they need a person with their own ideas and opinions. In addition to some bureaucratic state-owned enterprises, large enterprises, I think the general leadership of small and medium enterprises, are relatively enlightened, allowing some employees out of the responsibility for the project occasionally and he argued, and even challenged the son. Of course, to have a sense of propriety, to do things not people, not grudges, everything is for the sake of the project. I sometimes feel that I have done so much that I feel too stubborn and don't respect leadership in the meeting, but I still have respect and encouragement from the leaders, which makes me feel that leadership is the leader, and there is always something extraordinary in it. They are not involved in the project, afraid of the details, but also because they have more macro things to think about, need to control all aspects of the company, they have to worry about more than we do. In short, there is no irreplaceable employees, even if you are good, you leave, the company will continue to operate as usual. But bosses can't be replaced. Without the boss, everything will be parted.

I think there will be a lot of room for development in planning. A good product manager must also have a certain planning ability. It is also easiest to move from planning to Product manager or project management. But the quality of the people demanded higher. Switching from product to person is a rare transition. Product planners are required to begin to focus on dealing with more people and have strong planning and management skills. This is not discussed here. And because I'm a new guy after all. My other Brick article: "Website Planning introduction-Bricks and pieces" http://heidixie.blog.sohu.com/84312251.html

Reprint please specify the place, pay attention to me please click: Http://weibo.com/heidixie