Poor containment design decisions

For a web designer, whether you work for a design agency, a design department in a large company, or a freelancer, it's almost non-existent to start a job entirely on your own. Creating and deploying a new Web site is a team activity that requires the participation of customers, employers, other designers, and developers alike.

As a web designer, our role is not just to create an aesthetically pleasing web design, but also to be proficient in how visitors feel about the web and how they use the Web. To achieve the project requirements and objectives, web designers should be responsible for proposing the best design methods. This role cannot be treated casually.

Before any foundation is laid, the Web site project should start with a set of goals and discuss how to achieve those goals. In the beginning, the schedule should be arranged, the work assigned well, and the route to the project toward the desired goal needed to be worked out. In the planning stage, designers must first set their own pace and position their roles and responsibilities. It is a critical step to discuss with your client or boss what you think the design should be, because it will ensure that all members of the project agree.

When you first meet a client or employer, there is very little to talk about, because it is impossible for both sides to be consistent in every detail of how the site is designed. However, it is very difficult for designers to challenge the people who pay him a lot of money. If a designer is embarrassed to tell the people who work with him that they have made bad decisions, the designer is in a disadvantageous position at the outset.

Even if the client is working with someone else, they will insist on putting their horses ' photos on their new website.

For designers who have done a lot of web design projects with a variety of people, there are obvious patterns and early warning signs in the discussion of web design planning that eventually lead to a bad design decision. Most of the time, these decisions are bad because they use space, color, arrangement, etc. incorrectly. Years of experience and data analysis of web design in a variety of fields often give designers the knowledge and the information they have, so in this case they can make the right calls.

For example, in the design process of a Web site, when a customer is "clearly positioned" as a myth, you should tell the customer that you are not going to compress all the content into the top of the page just for that reason.

Although the increase in the row height to achieve better readability, but the customer is assuming that users do not have to scroll to read the content of the site under the premise of this conclusion.

Expressing your professional opinion confidently can help customers better understand the web designers they are hiring, and they will think that you are more than just designing software, HTML, and CSS.

If necessary, you may want to delve into some examples and show the results to your customers to support you. There are a lot of research and articles available on the Web to help prove what you're saying.

Keeping in touch with your customers can help you get an ideal solution and allow you to perform a new design as best as possible. This will make sure you do your job and make the project a good example of web design.

But what if the client doesn't accept what you think? At this point, those designers who have thought about what their site should look like before, and want to make it difficult for customers to compromise their ideas.

How much effort should he make to maintain his good design decisions before the designers concede and adopt a bad design strategy?

There are some things that can never be compromised. If the customer tells you that this brand new site needs to be designed for Internet Explorer 5.5 users--unless there is a need to design for these outdated browsers (which I suspect is not)--the knowledgeable designer will let the client go out and investigate before starting the project. Refusing to bow to major design and development mistakes often pays off in the end. Generally speaking, as a designer, a professional conversation about why you refuse to carry out a bad idea can make you win in most cases.

Apart from the projects you have in hand, it's a long term influence on your career to distinguish where you can and where not to get away from best practices. Because you know that some projects are impossible for you to do better, and thus lose enthusiasm, but you still work for these projects, this is undoubtedly a huge waste of your creativity, but also make your other work will be greatly affected.

In addition, you may lose a potential portfolio when you have to simplify your design in accordance with IE 5.5 standards. When your portfolio is filled with the best practices and web design standards for top works, there will eventually be a better project to be born. In these better projects, customers will see the value of these things. So it is sometimes a good reason to reject bad ideas by trying to get those portfolio reservations in a witty way.

On the other hand, we need to consider the time taken to prove and argue whether or not to support or oppose every bad idea. Because time is a big factor for any project with time constraints, especially those who have a bad idea about their website design.

When the deadline arrives, we may just spend all of our time trying to get the professional design idea across to the project, but the final project isn't finished, so we won't get paid by the customer.

For some people, it's important to work on web design because that's the main source of their income. In this way, the economy will be an important factor in their decision to implement bad ideas.

If the customer wants to put the 10244.html > video player on the home page of their site and have it play automatically when they open the Web site. At this point, even if your experience shows that the site users hate to do so, you have to spend a lot of time against him. But if customers are still unwilling to give in, then maybe you can just let it go.
After all, if we can make our customers happy but do not cost us anything, then maybe this time we let it be so good.

The accumulation of keywords now makes your site's ranking in search engines negatively affected.

We all want to be good at every project, but we can't afford to have each piece in the right place to get a good chance.

I know what you're going to say. I suggest that designers can take a soft and execute client's bad ideas, which is actually promoting bad thinking patterns and practices. Scrolling subtitles and GIF animations will make a comeback if you keep designing your site in the way customers do.

As I have said above, as a designer, always remember that it is important to make an impassable bottom line for yourself. A designer should define their personal criteria and use these criteria to determine what is acceptable, what is unacceptable, what is negotiable, and what is non-negotiable. Then the designer door should stick to it firmly.

Not every website design project can be a portfolio project or a reputable piece of work that deserves to be put in a design gallery. We all have projects that we are proud of without statutes. These projects, like skeletons in the closet, don't want to see the light, we tend to hide those items from the world. Why do we have to do these design projects? Because these projects will bring us income.

Ultimately, this will be the fact that our skills are also the source of our income. We all have to do a lot of things for economic reasons, and many people do something worse to make money.

For those who are still novices in the field of web design or are considering achieving a higher level of business, it is easy to be infected by the plethora of wonderful designs that can now be learned. But you can see that in the design of the display and your favorite designer's portfolio, there is no response to the design that makes money.

Don't ignore your customers ' opinions about how their site should be designed. Anytime you design a website for someone else, you can be assured that they know more about their target market than you do (at least at first).

Communication before you can make a website design direction is what this major decision. Many should work together to complete a project, because they can contribute their share of strength. When everyone who participates in a project respects the opinions of each other and engages in professional cooperation, the best results are produced.

There will inevitably be some conflict, and in some ways some people's advice is to push the project forward, and some people's advice is the opposite.
For those designers who want to live happily and do what they like, it's important to learn to walk around creating perfect websites and performing bad decisions.

Sometimes when you know that if you ignore the customer's requirements and your design will be better, will you perform an idea or workaround to achieve this effect? What do you learn in a Web design project when you disagree with others? [中文版]

Reprint Please specify:
Author: rockux–web Front end
From: poorly-tolerated design decisions