Respecting logic and creating products

Everything will have logic to follow. And I firmly believe that this sentence. Make any product decision-making basic basis, I think there are probably two kinds, one is through more fluent logical thinking, let oneself convinced decision-making reliability; the second is to make decisions by feeling.

So, as a product decision maker who respects logic, it is best to be able to demand and position products, and use the most rigorous logic to explain the seamless, airtight. And if it's a product decision maker who feels it all, it's best to develop empathy in the product.

Maybe someone might think about it logically, sometimes think about it, so this person is probably a Gemini man or a market guy. Product positioning of some products, from the beginning to 1 years after the occurrence of repeated changes, then in this product behind, most of them will have such a person in control. It's Hairenbujian.

But if you want to choose between logic and product, 2, I prefer the latter. Because there are many advantages to do so, of course, there are shortcomings.

Do things by feeling? It sounds so damn scary. In fact, the decisions made from the feeling, are logical thinking into the feeling, and made. Logical thinking, is the natural causal relationship of the mode of thought, in childhood to learn mathematical proof problems, has been inside into thinking. We are in the forefront of the product roll afraid of the time, constantly through a variety of conditioned reflex-like trial or error or feedback, so that their formation of the thought of curing, this thinking, is probably the so-called product feeling.

We gradually know what kind of wording users do not like, what kind of style is easy to understand and spread, what kind of information expression is fictitious, what kind of interactive mode most users spit, and so on. All this reflex-like quick feedback is the biggest asset of Internet products. Within a week, there may be countless such feedback, let us produce conditioned reflex, into thinking mode. This is almost anything other than Internet products can do.

Of course, different people accept these feedbacks, accept the speed and the degree are different, this is the individual ability difference. If you feel that your acceptance is too slow or too dull, or to do civil servants or traditional media, more reliable.

It goes on to say that such a large amount of information feedback, or called customer feedback, or market feedback, is a constant supply of product decision-makers. Use these supplies to correct their own logic system, and then through the adjustment of the logic system to determine their own product feeling, and then through the product feel determined decision-making, to look forward to the next feedback and correction, which is probably a product forward process, is a PM growth process. I believe that even in the domestic this mess, any one PM-led success of the product, the road to success, it must be the process of stable repetition of the process.

What about those who failed? which step of the process has gone wrong? It must be the basis of the PM to correct their logical system, with the wrong feedback, which often comes from the change of the company senior officials, KPI, market environment. You don't listen to the right user voice, but you are left with other unreliable sounds. SB.

Overall, the most reliable product decisions, should be the forefront of the product implementation, through the long haul in the vast amount of information feedback from the product feel to make. Of course, this should let all the KPIs on this person, who is responsible for decision-making. But more realities often diverge from this pattern. In fact, even if there is no harm, will be most of the product executor is not reliable, no matter who decision-making, does not affect the outcome of product failure. Unfortunately, a handful of reliable products are often stifled by this statement.

So, most of these people go to business.